Handbook of Paleoanthropology 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39979-4_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primate Origins and Supraordinal Relationships: Morphological Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, paleontologists have also had to deal with a complex, natural radiation of Paleocene, and early Eocene mammals with some features that are unique and primate‐like in the modern sense, and other features that are not. These early relatives of modern primates are classified as Plesiadapiformes [Bloch et al, ; Gunnell, ; Rose, ; Silcox et al, ; for reviews see Conroy, ; Fleagle, ]. The Plesiadapiformes stand in contrast to the later primates of the Eocene which are called “primates of modern aspect” or Euprimates (true primates) to avoid confusion with these archaic groups.…”
Section: The Origin Of Primates: a Paleontological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Historically, paleontologists have also had to deal with a complex, natural radiation of Paleocene, and early Eocene mammals with some features that are unique and primate‐like in the modern sense, and other features that are not. These early relatives of modern primates are classified as Plesiadapiformes [Bloch et al, ; Gunnell, ; Rose, ; Silcox et al, ; for reviews see Conroy, ; Fleagle, ]. The Plesiadapiformes stand in contrast to the later primates of the Eocene which are called “primates of modern aspect” or Euprimates (true primates) to avoid confusion with these archaic groups.…”
Section: The Origin Of Primates: a Paleontological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic phylogenetic analyses resolve that Gregory's [] century‐old Archonta (sans bats) is a natural grouping [e.g., Adkins & Honeycutt, ], and paleontological analysis of plesiadapiforms show they are nested adjacent to Primates, but within the extant archontan group of dermopterans and tree‐shrews [Bloch et al, ; Silcox et al, ]. There have been no viable, long‐lived departures from this hypothesis except for short episodes linking plesiadapiforms to dermopterans [Hoffstetter, ], like the one in which plesiadapiforms were linked with dermopterans based on misinterpreted fossil finger evidence [Beard, , ; see Krause, ].…”
Section: The Origin Of Primates: a Paleontological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eisenberg , table 43), although the molars of Purgatorius have been widely interpreted as reflecting an omnivorous diet, with the intake of ‘softer plant foods’ (Szalay and Delson , p. 45; also Szalay ; Silcox et al . ; Silcox and Gunnell ). The larger lower canines and longer, more trenchant molar crests of U. perpetior may imply a more insectivorous diet of that species, but one that in any case probably differed importantly from that of Purgatorius , a species of which also occurs at Simpson Quarry (Buckley ), sympatric with U .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(Sussman, ). The evolutionary emergence of the primate order around the Paleocene–Eocene boundary (Steiper & Seiffert, ) is concurrent with the spread and diversification of angiosperms (Eriksson ; Silcox, Sargis, Bloch, & Boyer, ; Sussman, ). Primates obtain energy from fruiting plants, and plants exploit the mobility of primates to disperse their seeds (Jordano, Forget, Lambert, Böhning‐Gaese, & Traveset, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%