1974
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8693(74)90023-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prime and composite polynomials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also false for rational functions, see [4] and [1]. We look for bounds for the degree of the extension in which we need to take the coefficients if a rational function with coefficients in Q has a decomposition in a larger field.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is also false for rational functions, see [4] and [1]. We look for bounds for the degree of the extension in which we need to take the coefficients if a rational function with coefficients in Q has a decomposition in a larger field.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(4) mean that α = p 1 · · · p r−1 and β = q 1 · · · q s−1 . (5) Recall that we have the equality |c| = |p r ||q s |. In combination with (3), i.e.…”
Section: Generalizations Of Ritt's Theorems For Reduction Monoidsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…8]. Previously special cases had been proved by Ritt [10], Levi [7], Dorey and Whaples [4], Schinzel [11], and Tortrat [14].…”
Section: The Key Property Of Dickson Polynomials Is Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%