2005
DOI: 10.1017/s0017089504002113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prime Divisors of Sequences Associated to Elliptic Curves

Abstract: Abstract. We consider the primes which divide the denominator of the xcoordinate of a sequence of rational points on an elliptic curve. It is expected that for every sufficiently large value of the index, each term should be divisible by a primitive prime divisor, one that has not appeared in any earlier term. Proofs of this are known in only a few cases. Weaker results in the general direction are given, using a strong form of Siegel's Theorem and some congruence arguments. Our main result is applied to the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Somos 4 sequences, and EDS in particular, are of considerable interest to number theorists due to the way that primitive prime divisors appear [6,7,9,10,11,12,35]. In that and in other respects, they have a lot in common with linear recurrence sequences (see [8, chapters 10 and 11]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Somos 4 sequences, and EDS in particular, are of considerable interest to number theorists due to the way that primitive prime divisors appear [6,7,9,10,11,12,35]. In that and in other respects, they have a lot in common with linear recurrence sequences (see [8, chapters 10 and 11]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the introduction of [3], it is claimed that there exists a preprint by Everest and King with a proof of our Theorem 1.9. This preprint was never published and we were not able to find the preprint.…”
Section: Remark 111mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Remark 1.9. In the introduction of [2], it is claimed that there exists a preprint by Everest and King with a proof of our Theorem 1.7. This preprint was never published and we were not able to find the preprint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2 . This follow easily from the study of the complex curve E ′ (C) and in particular from definition of ℘ E ′ (z) (see[9, Chapter VI]), since this function is close to z −2 for z close to 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%