2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.01.08.425835
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prime editing enables precise genome editing in mouse liver and retina

Abstract: Prime editing can induce any small-sized genetic change without donor DNA or double strand breaks. However, it has not been investigated whether prime editing is possible in postnatal animals. Here we delivered prime editors 2 and 3 into a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia, a genetic liver disease, using hydrodynamic injection, which corrected the disease-causing mutation and rescued the phenotype. We also achieved prime editing in the retina and retina pigment epithelium in wild-type mice by delivering pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, systemic injection of a single dose of AdV5 encoding the prime editing components into neonates resulted in an average of 58% editing at the Dnmt1 and 8% editing at the Pah enu2 locus. These rates are substantially higher than in recently reported prime editing studies in somatic tissues (20,45), and led to the restoration of physiological blood-L-Phe levels in Pah enu2 mice. Importantly, correction rates of approximately 10% in hepatocytes should also be sufficient to treat a variety of other genetic liver diseases, including tyrosinemia and urea cycle disorders (46)(47)(48).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In our study, systemic injection of a single dose of AdV5 encoding the prime editing components into neonates resulted in an average of 58% editing at the Dnmt1 and 8% editing at the Pah enu2 locus. These rates are substantially higher than in recently reported prime editing studies in somatic tissues (20,45), and led to the restoration of physiological blood-L-Phe levels in Pah enu2 mice. Importantly, correction rates of approximately 10% in hepatocytes should also be sufficient to treat a variety of other genetic liver diseases, including tyrosinemia and urea cycle disorders (46)(47)(48).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Although the editing efficiency was modest at the Fah disease locus, we reached therapeutic thresholds for HT1. Furthermore, the initial editing efficiency of the AAV9 delivered Nme2-ABE8e-U6 construct exceeded that reported previously using other precision genome editing tools and delivery approaches [65][66][67]70]. Future optimization of this system promises to improve efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In terms of off-targeting ratio, researchers frequently identify susceptible off-targeting sites and perform the analysis using techniques such as NGS ( Jang et al, 2021 ), circularization for in vitro reporting of cleavage effects by sequencing (CIRCLE-seq) ( Levy et al, 2020 ; Suh et al, 2021 ), and nickase-based Digenome sequencing (nDigenome seq) ( Kim et al, 2020 ). With that, the off-targeting rates can be often underestimated since only few predicted off-targeting sites are studied.…”
Section: Crispr-based Gene Editing: a Brief Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a preprint by Jang et al showed an editing efficiency of 1.87% in the Atp7b locus in transduced mouse retina (no cell sorting) and no detectable indels were found. Jang and others used a trans -splicing AAV8 vector, which allows the expression of a single transcript encoded by two independent vectors coadministered to the same tissue to deliver the PE to the retina via intravitreal injection, in conjunction with an additional AAV8 construct to deliver the pegRNA and sgRNA ( Jang et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Crispr-based Gene Editing: a Brief Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%