2022
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4196696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primed: Private Federated Training and Encrypted Inference on Medical Images in Healthcare

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, some work only evaluate their solutions on computer vision benchmark datasets (e.g., MNIST or CIFAR-10) inferring that good performance on these datasets will provide similar results on medical image data (Festag & Spreckelsen, 2020;Onesimu & Karthikeyan, 2020). However, this assumption is not empirically supported by work that uses both medical and non-medical datasets (Suriyakumar et al, 2021;Gopalakrishnan et al, 2021;Jarin & Eshete, 2021;Vizitiu et al, 2020) and must, therefore, be avoided.…”
Section: Open Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, some work only evaluate their solutions on computer vision benchmark datasets (e.g., MNIST or CIFAR-10) inferring that good performance on these datasets will provide similar results on medical image data (Festag & Spreckelsen, 2020;Onesimu & Karthikeyan, 2020). However, this assumption is not empirically supported by work that uses both medical and non-medical datasets (Suriyakumar et al, 2021;Gopalakrishnan et al, 2021;Jarin & Eshete, 2021;Vizitiu et al, 2020) and must, therefore, be avoided.…”
Section: Open Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%