Primetime Dispute Resolution: Reality TV Mediation Shows in China's “Harmonious Society”

Abstract

Through a case study of reality TV mediation shows, this article joins the debate about the recent promotion of formal and informal mediation by the Chinese government, what some scholars have called a “turn against law” (Minzner 2011). We identify three converging reasons for the sudden popularity of mediation shows on Chinese primetime television: (1) the desire of TV producers to commercially exploit interpersonal conflicts without fanning the flames of social instability; (2) the demands of official censors for TV programming promoting a “harmonious society”; and (3) the requirement for courts and other government institutions to publicly demonstrate their support for mediation as the most “appropriate” method for resolving interpersonal and neighborhood disputes. Cases drawn from two top‐rated mediation shows demonstrate how they privilege morality and “human feeling” (ganqing) over narrow application of the law. Such shows could be viewed merely as a form of propaganda, what Nader has called a “harmony ideology”—an attempt by the government to suppress the legitimate expression of social conflict. Yet while recognizing that further political, social, and legal reforms are necessary to address the root causes of social conflict in China, we conclude that TV mediation shows can help to educate viewers about the benefits and drawbacks of mediation for resolving certain narrow kinds of domestic and neighborhood disputes.

Mass media and the localization of emotional display: The case of China’s Next Top Model

“…The collectivist nature of traditional Chinese culture is explicitly promoted by the Chinese government. Around 2005, then President Hu Jintao launched the "harmonious society" campaign, which strongly influenced the content of Chinese television programs (Hawes, 2013;Zhu, 2008). Although scholars have acknowledged that Chinese media is functioning less and less as a government mouthpiece, and content is more influenced by commercial pressures, media producers continue to self-censor in order to please government regulators (Chan, 2009) and television remains a government propaganda tool (Hong, 2009).…”

Advocates, experts, and suspects: three images of lawyers in Chinese media reports

“…Research on Chinese courtroom dramas reveals a distinctive style of storytelling in legal films. Differing from the adversarial tradition in Hollywood films, Chinese court case dramas often predetermine the morality and guilt of the suspect and prioritize the pursuit of substantive justice and punishment in their narratives (Hawes & Kong, 2013;McIntyre, 2013). While the scholarship on the popular image of Chinese lawyers also suggests a dichotomous image of model lawyers versus mercenary lawyers, the existing literature is mostly based on films from the pre-1949 era (Conner, 2009(Conner, , 2010 or lawyer columns in a single newspaper or magazine (Michelson, 2008;Liu, 2011b).…”

“…Studies on Chinese law and media have been growing in recent years (Michelson, 2008;Conner, 2009Conner, , 2010Liu, 2011b;McIntyre, 2013;Hawes & Kong, 2013). Research on Chinese courtroom dramas reveals a distinctive style of storytelling in legal films.…”

“…[1] Only a few recent studies notice lawyers as experts in the media (Michelson, 2008;Liu, 2011b;Hawes & Kong, 2013). …”

Mainstream cultural production and audience citizenship

“…Especially after the implementation of the People's Mediation Law in 2010, Chinese dispute reality television shows and mediation shows have enjoyed increasing popularity (Hawes & Kong, 2013). Undoubtedly, both types of reality television programs function as social agents to discuss "law, morality, entertainment, and politics" (Hawes & Kong, 2013, p.750).…”