2016
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2016.1188820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Priming effect in affirmative complex conditional connectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a true possibility for conditionals but a false possibility for biconditionals) should be excluded and thus it would take long to process the conjunction if primed by a biconditional. However, I was not able to verify the MMT as Espino and Villar (2016) did: except for a negation effect, there was no reading time difference between German on condition that and the other tested CCs. Possible reasons for this need to be explored in future studies.…”
Section: Possibilitymentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…a true possibility for conditionals but a false possibility for biconditionals) should be excluded and thus it would take long to process the conjunction if primed by a biconditional. However, I was not able to verify the MMT as Espino and Villar (2016) did: except for a negation effect, there was no reading time difference between German on condition that and the other tested CCs. Possible reasons for this need to be explored in future studies.…”
Section: Possibilitymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…While the results in Liu (2019b) are less conclusive concerning the MMT, they provide empirical evidence for the biconditional tendency of on condition that, which was claimed in the descriptive literature (Montolío 2000;Alexe 2013), and simply assumed in the psychology literature (Espino and Villar 2016).…”
Section: Possibilitymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation