2018
DOI: 10.1002/nml.21335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Priming from the pulpit: Extending regulatory focus theory to church services

Abstract: The purpose of this research note is to extend a powerful cognitive psychology theory-regulatory focus theoryto a specific nonprofit organization: churches. We apply this theory to the design of church services to model how church leaders can structure services to enhance congregant experience and generate positive behavioral outcomes. We present an experiment utilizing 126 adult Americans as initial evidence for our framework. The results indicate that using appropriate regulatory focus priming strategies can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other research highlights that the more fluently perceivers can process a given stimulus, the more positive their response (e.g., Forster et al, 2013; Reber et al, 2004; Song & Schwarz, 2008). For instance, a demonstrative effect of fluency is exhibiting a preference for an option just because it “feels right” (e.g., Johnson et al, 2019; A. Y. Lee & Aaker, 2004; Williams et al, 2020). To demonstrate, Thibodeau and Durgin (2011), found that fluency explained why metaphors that demonstrate a high level of conventionality (phrases that include familiar terms that are easy to connect/process; i.e., “memory is a warehouse”) just feel right and are deemed as more suitable than metaphors that have low conventionality (terms that have less familiar associations and require more cognitive resources to process; i.e., “a fisherman is like a spider”).…”
Section: Overhead Aversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other research highlights that the more fluently perceivers can process a given stimulus, the more positive their response (e.g., Forster et al, 2013; Reber et al, 2004; Song & Schwarz, 2008). For instance, a demonstrative effect of fluency is exhibiting a preference for an option just because it “feels right” (e.g., Johnson et al, 2019; A. Y. Lee & Aaker, 2004; Williams et al, 2020). To demonstrate, Thibodeau and Durgin (2011), found that fluency explained why metaphors that demonstrate a high level of conventionality (phrases that include familiar terms that are easy to connect/process; i.e., “memory is a warehouse”) just feel right and are deemed as more suitable than metaphors that have low conventionality (terms that have less familiar associations and require more cognitive resources to process; i.e., “a fisherman is like a spider”).…”
Section: Overhead Aversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a demonstrative effect of fluency is exhibiting a preference for an option just because it "feels right" (e.g., Johnson et al, 2019;A. Y. Lee & Aaker, 2004;Williams et al, 2020).…”
Section: Processing Fluencymentioning
confidence: 99%