2000
DOI: 10.1093/petrology/41.6.789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primitive Magma From the Jericho Pipe, N.W.T., Canada: Constraints on Primary Kimberlite Melt Chemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
99
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
11
99
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(Table 1), melts compositions from the orthopyroxene-bearing experiments at 2.5 GPa (DPO-RS-002) and 4.5 GPa (DPO-RS-004), and the composition of the DP carbonatite after the assimilation of orthopyroxene and exsolution of CO 2 . The green circles represent a range of kimberlite compositions from previous studies (Price et al 2000;Le Roex et al 2003;Harris et al 2004;Kjarsgaard et al 2009;Kopylova et al 2009;Russell et al 2012) (Supplementary Table 4). The dashed line shows the effect of orthopyroxene assimilation on the composition of the DP carbonatite in the 2.5 GPa experiment, and the dotted line shows the effect clinopyroxene assimilation would have at lower pressure…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Table 1), melts compositions from the orthopyroxene-bearing experiments at 2.5 GPa (DPO-RS-002) and 4.5 GPa (DPO-RS-004), and the composition of the DP carbonatite after the assimilation of orthopyroxene and exsolution of CO 2 . The green circles represent a range of kimberlite compositions from previous studies (Price et al 2000;Le Roex et al 2003;Harris et al 2004;Kjarsgaard et al 2009;Kopylova et al 2009;Russell et al 2012) (Supplementary Table 4). The dashed line shows the effect of orthopyroxene assimilation on the composition of the DP carbonatite in the 2.5 GPa experiment, and the dotted line shows the effect clinopyroxene assimilation would have at lower pressure…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various models in vogue place their sources in (i) the subcontinental lithospheric mantle (SCLM) (e.g., Tainton and McKenzie 1994, Chalapathi Rao et al 2004, Becker & Le Roex 2006), (ii) convecting (asthenospheric) mantle (e.g., Price et al 2000, Griffin et al 2000, Mitchell 2008), (iii) the transitional zone (e.g., Ringwood et al 1992, Nowell et al 2004, Gaffney et al 2007, Paton et al 2007, and (iv) the core-mantle boundary (e.g., Haggerty 1999).…”
Section: Petrogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entrainment of, and reaction with, xenoliths and xenocrysts spanning the entire lithosphere greatly complicates the search for the primary kimberlite melt, and the picture is further obscured by post-emplacement alteration (Mitchell 1 3 1986(Mitchell 1 3 , 1995Price et al 2000;Kopylova et al 2007;Sparks et al 2009;Kjarsgaard et al 2009). Two of the key issues in kimberlite research that are still debated are as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%