2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principal-agent relationships in rural governance and benefit sharing in community forestry: Evidence from a community forest enterprise in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Keberadaan hutan rakyat di tengahtengah masyarakat memberikan manfaat yang sangat luas dengan demikian hutan rakyat harus dijaga kelestariannya. Tujuan dari pengelolaan hutan berkelanjutan ialah memberikan keuntungan ekonomi dari pemilik hutan, untuk meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat, demokrasi pedesaan, dan ketertiban sosial (misi sosial) (Yiwen et al 2019). Pengelolaan hutan rakyat yang baik akan berdampak pada kesejahteraan masyarakat sekitar hutan rakyat.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Keberadaan hutan rakyat di tengahtengah masyarakat memberikan manfaat yang sangat luas dengan demikian hutan rakyat harus dijaga kelestariannya. Tujuan dari pengelolaan hutan berkelanjutan ialah memberikan keuntungan ekonomi dari pemilik hutan, untuk meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat, demokrasi pedesaan, dan ketertiban sosial (misi sosial) (Yiwen et al 2019). Pengelolaan hutan rakyat yang baik akan berdampak pada kesejahteraan masyarakat sekitar hutan rakyat.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…The more serious problem was that farmers were excluded from collective forestry and shared few timber revenues (C. Liu, Wang, Liu, & Zhu, 2017). Due to the limited access to timber revenues, farmers lacked the incentives to protect forests, and timber theft was rampant (Yiwen, Kant, & Liu, 2019).…”
Section: Devolving Forests From the Administrative Village To Villagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our scope to develop causable relationship between CF management and village net economic benefit, in relation to conservation [45,46], the SES framework falls short. It does, however, offer a close connection with collective action theory [47][48][49], common-pool resource theory [50][51][52], and game theory [53][54][55].…”
Section: Conceptual Framework: Social-ecological System Analysis Of Nmentioning
confidence: 99%