2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5214(99)00070-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principal component analysis of chewing sounds to detect differences in apple crispness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in [17]. Attempts to classify foods using pattern recognition techniques were initially performed by DeBelie et al [18] and in the scope of ADM in [7]. These latter works showed that a low number of foods (below ten) can be classified in a laboratory setting using foam-based ear sensors, which result in high ear occlusion.…”
Section: Acoustic Food Intake Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in [17]. Attempts to classify foods using pattern recognition techniques were initially performed by DeBelie et al [18] and in the scope of ADM in [7]. These latter works showed that a low number of foods (below ten) can be classified in a laboratory setting using foam-based ear sensors, which result in high ear occlusion.…”
Section: Acoustic Food Intake Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Belie et al (2000) stated that higher frequency can be important since human hearing can be characterized by a logarithmic scale. Piezoelectric sensors in general are capable of sensing high frequency vibrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial attempts were made by DeBelie et al [27] to discriminate two classes of crispness in apples by analysing principal components in the sound spectrum of the initial bite. In a followup work DeBelie et al [28] classified the sound emissions from the initial bite of different dry-crisp snacks.…”
Section: Chewing Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%