1970
DOI: 10.1063/1.1658494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principal Hugoniot, Second-Shock Hugoniot, and Release Behavior of Pressed Copper Powder

Abstract: Principal Hugoniot, second-shock Hugoniot, and adiabatic release data obtained by gas gun experimental techniques are presented for porous copper prepared by hydrostatically pressing copper powder to a density of about 6.4 g/cm 3 • The bulk of the data presented pertain to a powder with initial particle diameters of 30 p., however, sufficient data are also presented for other particle diameters of 10, 50, and 100 p. to show that particle size variations over this range have no distinct effect on shock loading … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with the conclusions drawn by Kiselev [8]: the width of the compression-wave front in a porous material is determined by the time needed to fill the pores; the greater the characteristic size of pores or grains, the greater this time. Note, a similar structure consisting of two compression waves was observed, e.g., in studying dynamic compression of porous aluminum [8] and pressed copper powder samples [10] with a porosity k ≈ 1.2-1.5 and close velocities of the impactor. With increasing loading intensity, the second wave catches up with the first wave, the W (t) profiles are transformed, and the two-wave configuration is no longer observed for W 0 ≈ 300 m/sec.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This agrees with the conclusions drawn by Kiselev [8]: the width of the compression-wave front in a porous material is determined by the time needed to fill the pores; the greater the characteristic size of pores or grains, the greater this time. Note, a similar structure consisting of two compression waves was observed, e.g., in studying dynamic compression of porous aluminum [8] and pressed copper powder samples [10] with a porosity k ≈ 1.2-1.5 and close velocities of the impactor. With increasing loading intensity, the second wave catches up with the first wave, the W (t) profiles are transformed, and the two-wave configuration is no longer observed for W 0 ≈ 300 m/sec.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In addition to these features, sintered powders, foam-based materials, and ceramics whose particles are connected by a skeleton have additional peculiarities caused by skeleton compression or breakdown. For this reason, the behavior of a porous or fragmented material under shock-wave compression can be characterized by propagation of complicated multi-wave structures consisting of one or several elastic precursors and a wave of irreversible compression [5][6][7][8][9][10]. If the particles of a porous medium are connected by a skeleton, a three-wave configuration propagates over such a medium [5][6][7]9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The basic details are given elsewhere (Petrie and Page 1991;Petrie 1991) but the principal features and some extensions are described below. As shown by Boade (1970), there is a precursor wave generated in unsintered powder and twin precursor waves in sintered powder when these are subjected to shock loading. Only the case of a single precursor will be considered here.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The extent and distance over which these waves can be attenuated are important properties for shock mitigation, and rely upon understanding the behavior of powders under strong and weak loading. While earlier studies have shown the high stress behavior of porous materials to be insensitive to powder configuration [1], prior work on metal powder mixtures demonstrated that both powder morphology and particle size play a strong role in densification at low stresses [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%