1971
DOI: 10.1080/00022470.1971.10469560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principal Plume Dispersion Models: TVA Power Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

1973
1973
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For an elevated plume undergoing "fumigation" (i.e., rapid downward mixing to the ground) the prefumigation ffy values are probably best estimated from available experience on the behavior of power plant plumes that are emitted high in the nocturnal stable layer and from tall tower wind direction fluctuation data obtained in stable conditions. Direct experience of postfumigation ffy values (Carpenter et al, 1971) has indicated a broadening comparable to the depth of the layer through which the fumigation proceeds.…”
Section: Bulletin American Meteorologicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an elevated plume undergoing "fumigation" (i.e., rapid downward mixing to the ground) the prefumigation ffy values are probably best estimated from available experience on the behavior of power plant plumes that are emitted high in the nocturnal stable layer and from tall tower wind direction fluctuation data obtained in stable conditions. Direct experience of postfumigation ffy values (Carpenter et al, 1971) has indicated a broadening comparable to the depth of the layer through which the fumigation proceeds.…”
Section: Bulletin American Meteorologicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the analytical methods for predicting the concentration from stack need the plume rise height   Δh of stack (power plants). There are numerous methods for calculating the plume rise height; in this study it has been calculated, given by Carpenter et al, 1970: ; V s is the stack gas exit velocity, in m/s; d is the stack exit diameter in m; u is the speed at the stack exit in m/s; T s is the stack gas temperature; T a is the environmental temperature and g is the gravitational acceleration, m/s 2 . This method is especially useful because the potential temperature gradient factor is used for adjusting the different stability conditions.…”
Section: Application Of Analytical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the name suggests, the Briggs urban parameterization is appropriate for urban environments and includes the influence of increased mechanical turbulence from air flow through building canopies as well as buoyant turbulence during the evening/nighttime hours from the release of stored heat in structures and pavement. The Briggs open country parameterization is appropriate for more rural environments, like SRS, and is based on the combined results of several diffusion experiments (Pasquill [1961], Brookhaven National Laboratory [Smith 1961], and the Tennessee Valley Authority [Carpenter et al 1971]). The Briggs parameterizations are discussed by several authors, including Gifford (1976) and Hanna et al (1982).…”
Section: Standard Approximationsmentioning
confidence: 99%