1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00363886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principles and present status of a prospective multicenter study on the clinical relevance of the kiel classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These cases are identified.in Figure 2 and Table II: Myeloma, FCC cb/cc foll 'D', FCC cb/cc diff 'E'. This discrepancy has also been described in a previous study (Brittinger et al, 1981). The reliable determination of cases with a poor outcome very early could justify aggressive treatment in good histological sub-types of NHL.…”
Section: Specimenssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These cases are identified.in Figure 2 and Table II: Myeloma, FCC cb/cc foll 'D', FCC cb/cc diff 'E'. This discrepancy has also been described in a previous study (Brittinger et al, 1981). The reliable determination of cases with a poor outcome very early could justify aggressive treatment in good histological sub-types of NHL.…”
Section: Specimenssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The DNA was denatured by immersion for 2min in 0.07N NaOH, followed by the neutralisation of the base in 0.1 M borate buffer pH 8.5. Anti-BrdU (Grazner, 1982) was then applied for 30 min and visualised using the enhanced APAAP method (Cordell et al, 1984) Frozen sections (Figure 3a, Camplejohn & Macartney, 1985) and autoradiography (Costa et al, 1981a,b).…”
Section: Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survival of our patients appears to be similar to that of other reported series, both for high-and for low-grade malignant histologic subgroups [4,10,12,23]. We do not think that the treatment given to our patients influenced survival differently than did other therapies in other groups of patients [ 12,[24][25][26][27] , symptoms and bone marrow involvement [6]; (b) bul kiness of tumour, prior therapy, sex and lymphocyte count [7]; (c) haemoglobin concentration, treatment with adriamycin, sex, and prior therapy, for nodular types only [8]; (d) sex, symptoms, bone marrow in volvement and large gastrointestinal mass, in diffuse lymphomas only [10]; (e) histopathologic group and symptoms, with a number of minor humoral prognostic factors [12]; (0 achievement of complete remission, serum LDH level and presence or absence of liver involvement, in the high-grade histotypes only [13], where a high probability of achiev ing complete remission is given by the lack of B symptoms, absence of bone marrow involvement, high serum albumin and female sex.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Moreover, despite the relative complexity of all the classifications, until now histology has only been able to provide patients with a rough prognostic allo cation into either a merely high-or low-grade malig nant group or sometimes an intermediate one [4,5]. Experimental data on prognostic factors are fewer than those for Hodgkin's disease and often discordant or non-comparable [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple division into two, or possibly three, categories (low, intermediate, and high grade malignancy) has been advocated, which, in principle, reflects tumours containing small cytic cells or large blastic cells, respectively. This simple classification has been of practical value as a predictor of prognosis and in the selection of proper treatment (7,20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%