1989
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3735/22/9/010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principles and procedures for determining absolute differential electron-molecule (atom) scattering cross sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
141
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative-angle-dependent cross sections were further normalized to the absolute points obtained at several scattering angles (40 • , 80 • , or 90 • ) using the relative flow technique [19][20][21] and Ar as a reference gas, whose DCSs are known from both theoretical [22] and experimental [18,23] studies. In this method signal intensities of scattered electrons for the target and the referent gas are compared, at fixed scattering angle (θ ) and electron energy (E), under the same experimental conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative-angle-dependent cross sections were further normalized to the absolute points obtained at several scattering angles (40 • , 80 • , or 90 • ) using the relative flow technique [19][20][21] and Ar as a reference gas, whose DCSs are known from both theoretical [22] and experimental [18,23] studies. In this method signal intensities of scattered electrons for the target and the referent gas are compared, at fixed scattering angle (θ ) and electron energy (E), under the same experimental conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absolute cross sections were determined by comparison against He using a relativeflow method [5]. A specially designed magnetic angle changer allowed for measurements up to a 180 • scattering angle [6].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absolute values of the elastic cross sections were determined by the relative flow technique as described by Nickel et al [32] using the theoretical helium elastic cross sections of Nesbet [33] as a reference. The confidence limit is about ±15% for the elastic cross sections and ±20% for the inelastic cross sections (two standard deviations).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%