2015
DOI: 10.1504/ijmassc.2015.069597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principles for designing products with flexibility for future evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of this paper Tackett et al 2014;Watson et al 2016) use the concept of designed-in excess to provide systems with increased flexibility. Tilstra et al have presented several papers on the value of system flexibility and associated design guidelines (Tilstra et al 2009(Tilstra et al , 2012(Tilstra et al , 2015. They incorporate "High Definition Design Structure Matrix" (HDDSM) and "Change Modes and Effect Analysis" as tools to accomplish this.…”
Section: Review Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of this paper Tackett et al 2014;Watson et al 2016) use the concept of designed-in excess to provide systems with increased flexibility. Tilstra et al have presented several papers on the value of system flexibility and associated design guidelines (Tilstra et al 2009(Tilstra et al , 2012(Tilstra et al , 2015. They incorporate "High Definition Design Structure Matrix" (HDDSM) and "Change Modes and Effect Analysis" as tools to accomplish this.…”
Section: Review Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of ''product evolvability'' differentiate itself from the definitions of general design changeability (Fricke and Schulz 2005;Ross et al 2008) and design flexibility (Rajan et al 2005;de Neufville and Scholtes 2011;Tilstra et al 2013) by emphasizing heritance, path dependences and fitness-improving selection from an evolutionary perspective. Traditional engineering design change literature concerns changes in general, not differentiating positive (i.e., performance-improving) and negative (i.e., performance-reducing) changes.…”
Section: Product Evolvability and Design For Evolvabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The related literature provides a rich set of candidate design principles for evolvability, such as (just to name a few) modularity and autonomy ( (Simpson et al 2001(Simpson et al , 2013. On that basis, Tilstra et al (2013) proposed a categorization of actionable guidelines for implementing these design principles for product flexibility. Beesemyer et al (2011), Fulcoly (2012 and Ricci et al (2014) provide brief reviews of engineering system design principles for evolvability.…”
Section: Product Evolvability and Design For Evolvabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of methods for increasing CES lifecycle value have been explored in literature. Design for: adaptability [5], flexibility [6,7], changeability [8,9], and reconfigurability [10] all provide system designers with heuristics and tools to design an adaptable CES. The general focus of these studies has been on product architecture; with the optimization of system modularity and design of interfaces [11] as tools to reduce the time and cost, or generically "effort", for modifying a system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%