2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principles for scaling of distributed direct potable water reuse systems: A modeling study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
56
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To estimate the cost of NZW technology as applied to the Miami-Dade County's compliance plan to the ocean outfall legislation, the model presented previously for optimizing the cost of NZW systems as a function of treatment plant capacity was used. A detailed description of the model is presented by Guo and Englehardt (2015). Briefly, the model has the capability to generate fractal landscapes simulating actual landscapes with flat, hilly, or mountainous topographies in real locations.…”
Section: Methods: the Optimization Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To estimate the cost of NZW technology as applied to the Miami-Dade County's compliance plan to the ocean outfall legislation, the model presented previously for optimizing the cost of NZW systems as a function of treatment plant capacity was used. A detailed description of the model is presented by Guo and Englehardt (2015). Briefly, the model has the capability to generate fractal landscapes simulating actual landscapes with flat, hilly, or mountainous topographies in real locations.…”
Section: Methods: the Optimization Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary benefits include phosphate precipitation and organics reduction. Projected average daily and design flows in the sections entitled ''Simulated Costs for a Single Net-Zero Water System'' and ''Simulated Costs for Distributed Net-Zero Water Systems'' are based on the assumption of generalized average wastewater generation rates, as follows: 0.23 m 3 /d per capita (60 gallons per capita per day [gpcd]) for residential, 0.04 m 3 /d per capita (10 gpcd) for commercial and small industry, and 0.15 m 3 /d per capita (40 gpcd) for infiltration, for a total of 0.42 m 3 /d per capita (110 gpcd), with a peak factor of 2.09 design flow to average daily flow (Guo and Englehardt, 2015;Metcalf & Eddy, 2013).…”
Section: Methods: the Optimization Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations