Principles for the conservation of wild living resources

Abstract

We describe broadly applicable principles for the conservation of wild living resources and mechanisms for their implementation. These principles were engendered from three starting points. First, a set of principles for the conservation of wild living resources (Holt and Talbot 1978) required reexamination and updating. Second, those principles lacked mechanisms for implementation and consequently were not as effective as they might have been. Third, all conservation problems have scientific, economic, and social aspects, and although the mix may vary from problem to problem, all three aspects must be included in problem solving. We illustrate the derivation of, and amplify the meaning of, the principles, and discuss mechanisms for their implementation.The principles are: Principle I. Maintenance of healthy populations of wild living resources in perpetuity is inconsistent with unlimited growth of human consumption of and demand for those resources.Principle II. The goal of conservation should be to secure present and future options by maintaining biological diversity at genetic, species, population, and ecosystem levels; as a general rule neither the resource nor other components of the ecosystem should be perturbed beyond natural boundaries of variation.Principle III. Assessment of the possible ecological and sociological effects of resource use should precede both proposed use and proposed restriction or expansion of ongoing use of a resource.Principle IV. Regulation of the use of living resources must be based on understanding the structure and dynamics of the ecosystem of which the resource is a part and must take into account the ecological and sociological influences that directly and indirectly affect resource use.Principle V. The full range of knowledge and skills from the natural and social sciences must be brought to bear on conservation problems.Principle VI. Effective conservation requires understanding and taking account of the motives, interests, and values of all users and stakeholders, but not by simply averaging their positions.Principle VII. Effective conservation requires communication that is interactive, reciprocal, and continuous.Mechanisms for implementation of the principles are discussed.

Conflicts between traditional pastoralism and conservation of Himalayan ibex (Capra sibirica) in the Trans‐Himalayan mountains

“…Mangel et al (1996) and Folke (1996) emphasised the need for a trans-disciplinary conservation approach where human and ecological systems are seen in unison, with feedback across scales in time and space. Given the importance of livestock in the local economy of Pin Valley and the dynamism in land use and herding practices, there is a need for close monitoring of the livestock populations and herding practices and for social feedback to be constantly incorporated into conservation planning.…”

Seabirds as indicators of marine ecosystems

“…Ecosystem indicators are used in one part of a larger process to develop policy-level goals for ecosystem management (Kruse et al 2006). However, in order to use indicators effectively, we need to determine how ecosystem science relates to ecosystem-based fisheries management policies (Christensen et al 1996, Mangel et al 1996 by elucidating the mechanisms that link climate variability, oceanographic processes, trophic level production and fisheries (Carpenter & Folke 2006). Indicator species or processes also need to be vetted for independent secular or cyclical changes and the possibility that indicators themselves may disappear from the system.…”

Whales, science, and scientific whaling in the International Court of Justice

“…The Court made it clear that resolving the preservationist/conservationist [sustainable use (29)] dichotomy is neither a matter of science (30) nor law:…”