2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2019.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principles of Pediatric Endoscopic Ear Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
38
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“… 3 A “scope holder” is not recommended as motion parallax creates a sense of depth perception. TEES diminishes the need for a canal wall up mastoidectomy in some cases 12 and facilitates en bloc removal of cholesteatoma, with an improved chance of ossicular preservation 13 and decreased rates of residual and recurrent disease. 14 In studies comparing TEES to microscopic surgery for cholesteatoma, results have shown comparable or improved rates of control, 15 improved quality of life, decreased surgical morbidity, shorter healing time, and less postoperative pain due to avoidance of postauricular incisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 3 A “scope holder” is not recommended as motion parallax creates a sense of depth perception. TEES diminishes the need for a canal wall up mastoidectomy in some cases 12 and facilitates en bloc removal of cholesteatoma, with an improved chance of ossicular preservation 13 and decreased rates of residual and recurrent disease. 14 In studies comparing TEES to microscopic surgery for cholesteatoma, results have shown comparable or improved rates of control, 15 improved quality of life, decreased surgical morbidity, shorter healing time, and less postoperative pain due to avoidance of postauricular incisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 Postauricular approaches require added soft tissue retraction and bony drilling which can lead to dysesthesia or anesthesia of the auricle, hypertrophic scars, keloids, or wound infection. 2
Figure 1 Anatomy illuminated by microscope versus endoscope. A: The size and shape of the external auditory canal and speculum limit the microscopic view.
…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the relative ratio of the endoscope diameter to that of the ear canal presents an additional anatomic challenge. 2 A 2017 study of CT scans from 40 pediatric subjects with a median age of 8.5 years found that the average pediatric EAC isthmus is 5.4 mm in diameter, as compared to 6.9 mm in adults, and that 84% of pediatric patients were able to undergo transcanal EES with a 3 mm endoscope. 14 For smaller ear canals, 2.7 mm and 1.9 mm scopes are available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences are graft preparation, tympanomeatal flap methods, graft insertion (underlay-overlay-inlay-butterfly-push through), tampons placed in the outer ear canal (EAC) and tragal area, etc. [1][2][3][4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The placement of the graft prepared after flap elevation differs according to surgeons [2]. At this stage, we place the perichondrial tragal graft for the right ear on the malleus (over) in the posterior, under the anulus in the anterior (under), and the outer ear canal in the lateral.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%