1999
DOI: 10.2307/1534724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principles of Population Genetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 15-fold range of genetic diversities found within a single species is astonishing, drawing attention to the extremely low genetic diversities in bottlenecked and consanguineous pond populations. The discrepancy between Ne MR and Ne π was the greatest in these tiny populations, and given that their isolation probably greatly exceeds 4Ne generations (Hartl and Clark 2007), their elevated levels of diversity must be retained by factors other than demography. However, it is clear that the excess diversity of the small pond populations originated during the historical large population size, emphasizing that the mechanisms creating genetic diversity and those retaining it under altered circumstances can be different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The 15-fold range of genetic diversities found within a single species is astonishing, drawing attention to the extremely low genetic diversities in bottlenecked and consanguineous pond populations. The discrepancy between Ne MR and Ne π was the greatest in these tiny populations, and given that their isolation probably greatly exceeds 4Ne generations (Hartl and Clark 2007), their elevated levels of diversity must be retained by factors other than demography. However, it is clear that the excess diversity of the small pond populations originated during the historical large population size, emphasizing that the mechanisms creating genetic diversity and those retaining it under altered circumstances can be different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Heterozygotes, however, did not result in statistically significant costs in terms of growth and reproduction. These results suggest that rather than being entirely recessive, these mutations are non-additively underdominant [28]. Selection against the heterozygous state leads to a bistable evolutionary dynamic resembling two peaks separated by a low fitness valley.…”
Section: (A) Adaptive Novelty Mediated By Recessive Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Conversely, F IS , the inbreeding coefficient, is only weakly correlated with H O and the other five genetic parameters. This is because, while the other metrics describe the genetic variation present in a population, F IS describes the arrangement of that genetic diversity within and among individuals (i.e., the deficit of heterozygotes relative to Hardy–Weinberg expectations), which is influenced by inbreeding and/or population structure (Hartl & Clark, 2007). While H O captures general patterns of standing genetic variation across these populations, the inbreeding coefficient is most relevant to the question of how ID might affect population dynamics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%