2018
DOI: 10.20431/2347-3134.0601002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principles, Theories and Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of discursive practices, social and cultural production varieties take place. Some characteristics related to CDA are presented by Amoussou and Allagbe (2018) in their research. The first one is related to the inter and multidisciplinary scope of the approach, since it can be used in several areas and for different purposes as long as the goal of the relationship between society and culture is achieved.…”
Section: Critical Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of discursive practices, social and cultural production varieties take place. Some characteristics related to CDA are presented by Amoussou and Allagbe (2018) in their research. The first one is related to the inter and multidisciplinary scope of the approach, since it can be used in several areas and for different purposes as long as the goal of the relationship between society and culture is achieved.…”
Section: Critical Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical discourse analysis is the most effective analytical tool, it has been used in various linguistic settings, among which transitivity has been discussed as an analytical tool (Shuo et al, 2014). There are various approaches to critical discourse analysis methods, including the methods of Fairclough, Van Dijk, and Wodak (Amoussou & Allagbe, 2018). Fairclough Fairclough (2003) defines CDA as a form of critical social science that is directed to illuminate the problems faced by people by certain forms of social life and to contribute resources that people might use in dealing with and overcoming these problems.…”
Section: Critical Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical Discourse Analysis in its distinct manner, now not a homogenous version, nor a faculty or a paradigm; however, it is far more than that, at most a shared angle on doing linguistics, semiotics, or discourse evaluation (Amoussou, 2018;Ledin & Machin, 2017;van Dijk, 1998). Giving power to written and spoken texts (Flowerdew & Richardson, 2017), Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is necessary for describing, decoding, and critiquing social life contemplated in the text (Luke, 1997).…”
Section: Critical Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%