2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2014.6854803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Printer identification from micro-metric scale printing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metropolis-Hasting within Gibbs algorithm is conducted with 30000 MCMC iterations with 10000 as burn-in period. The realisation from the Spatial binary model [23] is illustrated to compare the improvement as well. Tab.…”
Section: Estimation Results From Printed Dotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Metropolis-Hasting within Gibbs algorithm is conducted with 30000 MCMC iterations with 10000 as burn-in period. The realisation from the Spatial binary model [23] is illustrated to compare the improvement as well. Tab.…”
Section: Estimation Results From Printed Dotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shape of the profile contains the characteristics of the printed dots, which means the shape of the dots contains the identity of the source printer in some sense. The model in [22,23] introduced the parameters controlling the width of the droplets, the density of the black pixels and the average number of black pixels. However, the interaction with the surrounding pixels was not taken into account.…”
Section: Printed Dots At the Microscopic Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Each printed and scanned set of dots (a dot being a binary element) suffers from a stochastic non-invertible noise which makes the reproduction of the original graphical code impossible [12,14,10,9] (see in Fig. 1).…”
Section: Studied Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%