2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10544-014-9915-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Printing cell-laden gelatin constructs by free-form fabrication and enzymatic protein crosslinking

Abstract: Considerable interest has arisen in precision fabrication of cell bearing scaffolds and structures by free form fabrication. Gelatin is an ideal material for creating cell entrapping constructs, yet its application in free form fabrication remains challenging. We demonstrate the use of gelatin, crosslinked with microbial transglutaminase (mTgase), as a material to print cell bearing hydrogels for both 2-dimensional (2-D) precision patterns and 3-dimensional (3-D) constructs. The precision patterning was attain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
105
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
105
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An ink material can become a scaffold after a certain treatment such as heat, ions, enzymes and light. Examples of typical bioink materials are alginate [20], gelatin [21], and gelatin methacryloyl [16,22,23]. Ideal bioinks have some important characteristics such as low cost, printability, cell compatibility and cell-specific functionality [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An ink material can become a scaffold after a certain treatment such as heat, ions, enzymes and light. Examples of typical bioink materials are alginate [20], gelatin [21], and gelatin methacryloyl [16,22,23]. Ideal bioinks have some important characteristics such as low cost, printability, cell compatibility and cell-specific functionality [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research conducted by Billiet et al in 2014 showed that the 3D printed GelMA scaffold had excellent cell viability and scaffold stability for 14 days, indicating that GelMA could have great potential as a bioink for 3D bioprinting [16]. Most of the existing research studies carried out on GelMA focused on rheological studies [21], printing parameters [16] and cell viability [16,21,22]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] However, the advantage of direct fabrication techniques, especially of 3D bioprinting, is its ability to generate constructs with spatially defined cell and material composition. Moreover, biomaterials that are conventionally used in cell culture such as alginate, [9] Pluronic, [10] gelatin, [11] nanocellulose, [12] self-assembling peptides, [13] and agarose [14] are highly advantageous for direct cell printing as they are soluble in water and hence can be formulated as a cell carrier. There has been extensive effort to build on and improve the properties of watersoluble polymers as bioinks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its application has given tissue engineers a method for cellular deposition with control up to the micrometer level [1,2] . Additionally, cell adhering surfaces can be modified to influence the orientation and morphology of the attached cells [3] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells can be directly seeded onto a patterned surface; however, when more than 1 cell lines are seeded and their spatial distribution is important, then the deposition of the cells require more accurate control. We have previously demonstrated how cells can be bioprinted with relative precision using robotic dispensing system, delivering viable cells within a hydrogel bioink [1] . When cell-containing growth medium is deposited, the printed trace spreads out due to its low viscosity (at approximately 0.94 cP) [22] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%