2009
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prion Strain Discrimination Based on Rapid In Vivo Amplification and Analysis by the Cell Panel Assay

Abstract: Prion strain identification has been hitherto achieved using time-consuming incubation time determinations in one or more mouse lines and elaborate neuropathological assessment. In the present work, we make a detailed study of the properties of PrP-overproducing Tga20 mice. We show that in these mice the four prion strains examined are rapidly and faithfully amplified and can subsequently be discriminated by a cell-based procedure, the Cell Panel Assay.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
37
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
7
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two mouse prion strains, RML and 22L, were used to seed conversion of PrP C . RML and 22L strains are distinguished by their differing incubation period and brain lesion distribution in mice (46).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two mouse prion strains, RML and 22L, were used to seed conversion of PrP C . RML and 22L strains are distinguished by their differing incubation period and brain lesion distribution in mice (46).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases, 3rd-passage incubation periods for animals injected with 1% brain homogenates of TSE-positive 2nd-passage inocula were dramatically reduced (Table 1). With the exception of tg44 ϩ/ϩ mice, incubation periods converged on values longer than those associated with typical mouse scrapie in the respective mouse strains (13,15,29). Remarkably, the average incubation period for the 2nd passage of the D013 agent in tg44 ϩ/ϩ mice (234 Ϯ 19 dpi) was approximately 100 days faster than that for primary passage of 22L or Chandler in the same mouse strain (13).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, they are prone to variable expression levels and patterns, depending on copy number and genome integration site. Indeed, one of the most popular vectors for modeling neurodegenerative diseases, a Prnp promoter fragment lacking an intron that contains regulatory information, is highly prone to integration effects (23,33,34). Even very large vectors such as those created by BACs can have variable spatial expression patterns (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%