2016
DOI: 10.1093/conphys/cov061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prior exposure to capture heightens the corticosterone and behavioural responses of little penguins (Eudyptula minor) to acute stress

Abstract: The hormonal stress response was determined for little penguins naïve to human activity and little penguins exposed to research and tourism. Penguins exposed to human activity showed elevated stress hormone levels 30 minutes after capture, indicating that they may be sensitised rather than habituated to some types of human interaction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was likely the result of the tourism operation at the Oamaru Blue Penguin Colony implementing strategies to regulate human disturbances such as reduced noise, light and movement from visitors and restricted visitor viewing areas; effects that are consistent with past research (Dann 1992;Rogers et al 1995;Shaughnessy and Briggs 2009;Wiebkin 2011;Agnew and Houston 2020). Also, this research adds to the growing evidence that little penguins, found at different locations, may respond to visitors in a similar manner if the nature of visitor contact is the same (Klomp et al 1991;Weerheim et al 2003;Giling et al 2008;Carroll et al 2016). However, penguin responses may vary as a result of characteristics of the environment differing at each location which may influence the nature of visitor contact.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This was likely the result of the tourism operation at the Oamaru Blue Penguin Colony implementing strategies to regulate human disturbances such as reduced noise, light and movement from visitors and restricted visitor viewing areas; effects that are consistent with past research (Dann 1992;Rogers et al 1995;Shaughnessy and Briggs 2009;Wiebkin 2011;Agnew and Houston 2020). Also, this research adds to the growing evidence that little penguins, found at different locations, may respond to visitors in a similar manner if the nature of visitor contact is the same (Klomp et al 1991;Weerheim et al 2003;Giling et al 2008;Carroll et al 2016). However, penguin responses may vary as a result of characteristics of the environment differing at each location which may influence the nature of visitor contact.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We minimized handling time and in most cases total time spent at a nest including deployment and retrieval of devices was less than 8 min. To reduce stress caused by repeated handling [27], penguin pairs were given a respite from tracking for 5 -7 days in the middle of sampling, during which time the nest was not visited. Throughout the study the mass of chicks and adults were monitored, and tracking of an individual ceased if it lost more than 15% body mass over the study period (average mass change less than 10%), dropped below 900 g or changed its nest attendance patterns (n ¼ 2 individuals excluded during the study).…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Penguin Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Handling time was kept to a minimum, and in most cases was <5 min for both deployment and retrieval of devices. Penguins during this study were only handled twice, once for deployment and once for removal of devices to minimise stress associated with handling (Carroll et al 2016b). All animal research protocols were carried out in accordance with guidelines approved by the Macquarie University Animal Ethics Committee (Animal Research Authority 2014/057).…”
Section: P E N G U I N T R a C K I N Gmentioning
confidence: 99%