2021
DOI: 10.1590/2175-7860202172033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prior fertilization enables higher survival of relocated terricolous orchids?

Abstract: The construction of highways causes several impacts on the environment, including, the suppression of vegetation, which can lead to reduced biodiversity. One mitigating measure involves reallocating plant to protected areas and orchids might be important for this use. An example could be the terricolous orchid Sauroglossum nitidum. In an attempt to optimize the survival of S. nitidum following reallocation, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the fertilization can increase the survival of this orc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the alternatives, the relocation of plant species removed from the area destined to road works in conservation sites where the natural occurrence of these species has been detected (Araújo 2006). Primack (2008) and, more recently, Guardia et al (2021) and Suzuki et al (2021) have highlighted the importance of transplanting species from areas aimed for vegetation removal to other places considered suitable for their relocation, as has been recommended by Jasper et al (2005) and Duarte & Gandolfi (2013), primarily in protected areas (Santos Júnior & Tamaki 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the alternatives, the relocation of plant species removed from the area destined to road works in conservation sites where the natural occurrence of these species has been detected (Araújo 2006). Primack (2008) and, more recently, Guardia et al (2021) and Suzuki et al (2021) have highlighted the importance of transplanting species from areas aimed for vegetation removal to other places considered suitable for their relocation, as has been recommended by Jasper et al (2005) and Duarte & Gandolfi (2013), primarily in protected areas (Santos Júnior & Tamaki 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%