2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2102.12525
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prior Image-Constrained Reconstruction using Style-Based Generative Models

Abstract: Obtaining an accurate and reliable estimate of an object from highly incomplete imaging measurements remains a holy grail of imaging science. Deep learning methods have shown promise in learning object priors or constraints to improve the conditioning of an ill-posed imaging inverse problem. In this study, a framework for estimating an object of interest that is semantically related to a known prior image, is proposed. An optimization problem is formulated in the disentangled latent space of a style-based gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent methods have been developed for regularizing image reconstruction problems based on GANs such as Compressed Sensing using Generative Models (CSGM) [60] and image-adaptive GAN-based reconstruction methods (IAGAN) [61], [62]. Sty2AmGANs can also be used for prior image-constrained reconstruction [59]. The established SOMs can also be used to produce clean reference images for training deep neural networks for solving other image-processing problems such as image denoising [63], [64] and image super-resolution [65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent methods have been developed for regularizing image reconstruction problems based on GANs such as Compressed Sensing using Generative Models (CSGM) [60] and image-adaptive GAN-based reconstruction methods (IAGAN) [61], [62]. Sty2AmGANs can also be used for prior image-constrained reconstruction [59]. The established SOMs can also be used to produce clean reference images for training deep neural networks for solving other image-processing problems such as image denoising [63], [64] and image super-resolution [65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the groundtruth objects corresponding to the synthesized images were not accessible in this experimental study, only a subjective visual assessment was performed. The style-based generator used in Sty2AmGAN can provide additional ability to control scale-specific image features [58], [59].…”
Section: Experimental Emulated Single-coil Mri Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aspects of this work were published as a part of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) 2021. 21…”
Section: Disclosurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to a superior performance in image synthesis, the style-specific control that is gained with a StyleGAN generator can be leveraged to perform meaningful semantic transformations of objects in tomographic imaging applications [31]- [33]. To perform such semantic transformations, an embedding for the given object must be obtained first in the latent space of the StyleGAN.…”
Section: A Salient Features Of the Stylegan Latent Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the tolerance level for data consistency to accept a high-resolution image estimate was chosen in an arbitrary fashion irrespective of the measurement noise distribution, and thus it is difficult to determine the degree to which data consistency is being preserved. Third, while the PULSE method as well as previous studies such as [31], [35], [36] employed the prior assumption that the latent vectors {v i } follow a standard multivariate Gaussian distribution, no rigorous quantitative evaluation was performed to justify the accuracy of this ansatz. While the lack of such quantitative validation may still be acceptable for a computer vision task where the objective is to obtain diverse photo-realistic face images from a given low-resolution image, quantitative assessment of the method is critical for a proper assessment of tomographic imaging systems.…”
Section: B Empirical Sampling With Pulsementioning
confidence: 99%