2011
DOI: 10.1093/cid/cir809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prior Infections With Seasonal Influenza A/H1N1 Virus Reduced the Illness Severity and Epidemic Intensity of Pandemic H1N1 Influenza in Healthy Adults

Abstract: The 2009 A/H1N1 epidemic among healthy adults was relatively mild, most likely because of immunity from prior infections with A/H1N1 viruses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
26
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our studies volunteers were treated as soon as significant symptoms or positive blood film developed, therefore only clinical features in the early phase of illness were addressed, and it remains possible that the power to distinguish between these infections clinically might be improved with a longer duration of illness. In addition the use of a non-pandemic challenge strain of influenza in this study may reduce generalisability of findings to pH1N1, which has higher pathogenicity in younger individuals 11 presumably related to reduced pre-existing immunity 12 ; yet all volunteers in our study had no detectable pre-existing immunity to the challenge strain, so in this context they might be considered more representative of a pandemic exposed population. Moreover, the pre-assessment probability of infection has a major impact on the PPV and NPV, so during a pandemic setting (where the prevalence of influenza would be significantly greater than malaria) the case definition would be expected to perform significantly better.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In our studies volunteers were treated as soon as significant symptoms or positive blood film developed, therefore only clinical features in the early phase of illness were addressed, and it remains possible that the power to distinguish between these infections clinically might be improved with a longer duration of illness. In addition the use of a non-pandemic challenge strain of influenza in this study may reduce generalisability of findings to pH1N1, which has higher pathogenicity in younger individuals 11 presumably related to reduced pre-existing immunity 12 ; yet all volunteers in our study had no detectable pre-existing immunity to the challenge strain, so in this context they might be considered more representative of a pandemic exposed population. Moreover, the pre-assessment probability of infection has a major impact on the PPV and NPV, so during a pandemic setting (where the prevalence of influenza would be significantly greater than malaria) the case definition would be expected to perform significantly better.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, a number of investigations have focused on the protectiveness of heterologous immunity to pH1N1 infection, conferred from previous exposure to circulating influenza strains or vaccines (19, 27, 28). Human studies and mouse models have demonstrated that cross-reactive T cells and cross-reactive non-neutralizing antibody defenses can limit viral load and protect from a lethal heterologous influenza infection (10, 19, 21, 30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, seasonal influenza A-specific memory T cells from humans (naïve to pH1N1) are capable of recognizing pH1N1 epitopes and can directly lyse pH1N1-infected target cells (19). Therefore, the ability of cross-protective memory T cells to control pH1N1 infection could explain the relatively benign symptoms experienced by a majority of those infected (19, 28). However, cross-reactive antibody protection to pH1N1 cannot be ignored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6], [18], [19] In contrast with this, some degree of cross protection from severe illness by prior seasonal vaccination was suggested in some studies. [20], [21], [22] Prior infection with an influenza A virus can reduce morbidity and mortality caused by an infection with an antigenically divergent influenza A virus because of heterosubtypic immunity, both within and between subtypes. [23] Both natural infection and seasonal vaccination can induce heterosubtypic neutralizing antibodies, but our data suggest skewing against such antibodies in persons with a history of seasonal vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%