2021
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac06a4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prior Probability Distributions of Neutron Star Crust Models

Abstract: To make best use of multifaceted astronomical and nuclear data sets, probability distributions of neutron star models that can be used to propagate errors consistently from one domain to another are required. We take steps toward a consistent model for this purpose, highlight where model inconsistencies occur, and assess the resulting model uncertainty. Using two distributions of nuclear symmetry energy parameters—one uniform, the other based on pure neutron matter theory—we prepare two ensembles of neutron st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where P(X) is the prior, and N is a normalization factor. The different constraints c k used in the present study are as follows: (a) nuclear mass measurements in the AME2016 mass table [27]; (b) the bands of allowed region in symmetric and pure neutron matter produced by many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) calculations from Reference [35] based on two-and three-nucleon chiral effective field-theory (EFT) interactions at next-to-next-tonext-to leading order (N3LO), which are interpreted as a 90% confidence interval; (c) mass measurement from radio-timing observations of pulsar PSR J0348+0432 [36], M J03 = 2.01 ± 0.04M , where M is the solar mass; (d) constraints on the tidal deformability of the binary NS system associated to the gravitational wave event GW170817, detected by the LIGO/Virgo Collaboration (LVC) [7]; (e) X-ray pulse-profile measurements of PSR J0030+0451's mass, M J00 = 1.44 +0.15 −0.14 M , and radius, R J00 = 13.02 +1.24 −1.06 km from Reference [2]; (f) the radius measurement with NICER and XMM-Newton data [4] of the PSR J0740+6620 pulsar of mass M J07 = 2.08 ± 0.07M [37], R J07 = 13.7 +2.6 −1.5 km [4]. Posterior distributions of different observables Y are calculated by marginalizing over the EoS parameters as:…”
Section: Bayesian Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where P(X) is the prior, and N is a normalization factor. The different constraints c k used in the present study are as follows: (a) nuclear mass measurements in the AME2016 mass table [27]; (b) the bands of allowed region in symmetric and pure neutron matter produced by many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) calculations from Reference [35] based on two-and three-nucleon chiral effective field-theory (EFT) interactions at next-to-next-tonext-to leading order (N3LO), which are interpreted as a 90% confidence interval; (c) mass measurement from radio-timing observations of pulsar PSR J0348+0432 [36], M J03 = 2.01 ± 0.04M , where M is the solar mass; (d) constraints on the tidal deformability of the binary NS system associated to the gravitational wave event GW170817, detected by the LIGO/Virgo Collaboration (LVC) [7]; (e) X-ray pulse-profile measurements of PSR J0030+0451's mass, M J00 = 1.44 +0.15 −0.14 M , and radius, R J00 = 13.02 +1.24 −1.06 km from Reference [2]; (f) the radius measurement with NICER and XMM-Newton data [4] of the PSR J0740+6620 pulsar of mass M J07 = 2.08 ± 0.07M [37], R J07 = 13.7 +2.6 −1.5 km [4]. Posterior distributions of different observables Y are calculated by marginalizing over the EoS parameters as:…”
Section: Bayesian Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It only accepts models satisfying all the following conditions: causality, thermodynamic stability, and non-negative symmetry energy at all densities. The second term in Equation ( 6), P(J03|X), is the likelihood probability from the mass measurement of PSR J0348+0432 [36], which is M J03 = 2.01 ± 0.04M . This likelihood is defined as the cumulative Gaussian distribution function with a mean value of 2.01 and a standard deviation of 0.04:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explorations of the space of neutron star crust EOSs are not as developed as those of the core EOS. There exists only two attempts to systematically generate of crust model ensembles, using meta-models [74,75,48] and using an extended Skyrme EDF [76,77].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. A large number of extended Skyrme EDFs [94,76] with three degrees of freedom J, L, K sym are generated, from which neutron skin predictions are calculated. 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation