2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Priorities for Closing the Evidence-Practice Gaps in Poststroke Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, our previous prioritization research has identified that the two target behaviours we aimed to change in this study had different ratings on a number of implementation criteria, including the evidence–practice gap, modifiability and health impact (Shrubsole et al . ). There was a larger evidence–practice gap for collaborative goal setting in the acute phase compared with information provision (73% gap versus 51% gap).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, our previous prioritization research has identified that the two target behaviours we aimed to change in this study had different ratings on a number of implementation criteria, including the evidence–practice gap, modifiability and health impact (Shrubsole et al . ). There was a larger evidence–practice gap for collaborative goal setting in the acute phase compared with information provision (73% gap versus 51% gap).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This was selected as it had previously been identified as an important implementation priority (Shrubsole et al . ), and there was existing evidence of barriers to implementation by acute SLTs (Shrubsole et al . ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods of applying evidence in clinical practice have been researched and include identification of local barriers; audit and feedback; educational meetings and workshops and educational outreach and collaborations (O'Brien, et al, 2007;Forsetlund, et al, 2009;Ivers, et al, 2014). Specifically, in the clinical practice of aphasia rehabilitation, areas of high priority for implementation of clinical change have been identified and include information provision and patient-centred goal setting (Shrubsole, et al, 2017). These two areas of priority are highly relevant to enhancing mood and improving depression outcomes for people with aphasia and their significant others as highlighted in a systematic review (Baker, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These constraints may be related to: caseload pressures, the culture of the workplace, and leadership in quality improvement (Miao, Power, & O'Halloran, 2015). An evidence-practice gap in aphasia rehabilitation exists (Shrubsole, Worrall, Power, & O'Connor, 2017), understanding the barriers relating to people with aphasia and their significant others is essential to improving psychological care.…”
Section: Barriers To Psychological Care In Stroke and Aphasia Rehabilmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation