Priorities in occupational health research: a Delphi study in The Netherlands.

Abstract

Objectives-To achieve a coherent programme of topics for research in occupational health and safety, with well founded priorities and to relate them to perceived gaps and needs in The Netherlands. Methods-In the first phase ofthe study 33 key informants were interviewed. In the second phase questionnaires were sent to 150 Dutch experts (including the key informants). Four groups were recruited, originating from: occupational health and safety services; scientific research institutes; governmental and other administrative bodies; and companies. Using the Delphi technique, the experts were asked to prioritise several topics, which were placed under different headings. In the third phase five workshops were organised to elaborate on the highly prioritised topics. Results-The response rates were 86% for the first and 81% for the second questionnaire. In the second round consistency was reached and consensus proved to be satisfactory, so that the Delphi process was stopped. There were surprisingly few differences in opinion between the four groups. The most important heading was "design/implementationlevaluation of measures", in which the topic cost-benefit analysis of measures had the highest score. "Assessment of relations between exposure and effect" was the second most important heading. Under this heading, topics on work stress were generally judged to be more important than topics on musculoskeletal disorders, which in turn had higher scores than topics on safety and biological, chemical, and physical hazards. The headings "occupational rehabilitationlsociomedical guidance" and "occupational health care/ occupational health services" had about the same priority, closely following the heading "assessment of relations between exposure and effect".Conclusions-The general agreement on priorities should provide a sufficiently broad basis for decision makers to initiate a long term programme for occupational health research and development in The Netherlands.(Occup Environ Med 1997;54:504-5 10)

Economic evaluations of occupational health interventions from a corporate perspective – a systematic review of methodological quality

“…There are two driving forces that have led to a growing interest in economic evaluations of occupational safety and health (OSH) interventions (1)(2)(3). First, health problems among the working population have a significant and far-reaching socioeconomic impact.…”

Trends and priorities in occupational health research and knowledge transfer in Italy

“…Various studies have been done in different parts of the world to identify OSH priority themes (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) and critical comparative analyses have focused on the approaches used to consult experts, the methods of investigation employed, the results found, and their impact on social, economic, political, and scientific decisions (13,14).…”

Consensus-based findings and recommendations for estimating the costs of health-related productivity loss from a company’s perspective

“…To improve the efficiency of the study procedure, the first round was modified from being predominantly qualitative to quantitative, in which a predetermined set of items was presented to the expert panel for rating (14,27,29). The items were identified from published literature, existing guidelines, and productivity measurement tools, as well as from 10 exploratory interviews with human resource personnel, financial advisors, and occupational physicians employed at various size companies.…”

“…Uegaki et al companies become more aware of the need to pay attention to the health of their employees and look to implement occupational health interventions in the workplace setting, tailored evidence is required for informative health-investment decision making by a company (2,3,5,14,15).…”