2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prioritisation of ICU treatments for critically ill patients in a COVID-19 pandemic with scarce resources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
77
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
77
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a debate in many countries about the prioritization of critical care for patients who will get the most benefit to save the highest number of lives. 20 Thus, it is crucial to determine who would benefit most from intensive care and ventilator support and allocation of scarce resources. 21 However, this concept is both practically and ethically challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a debate in many countries about the prioritization of critical care for patients who will get the most benefit to save the highest number of lives. 20 Thus, it is crucial to determine who would benefit most from intensive care and ventilator support and allocation of scarce resources. 21 However, this concept is both practically and ethically challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fundamental principle underpinning all pandemic responses is the maximisation of benefit from scarce resources [6]. Resource scarcity and resource saturation are fluid judgements, relying on continual cycles of appraisal, integrating real-time data, and epidemiological projections [8]. Maximising benefit refers not only to enhancing survival in individuals, but also to extending this opportunity to as many patients as possible or most appropriate candidates to benefit from.…”
Section: Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, identifying patients with the greatest potential to benefit from this resourceintense intervention is limited by the evolving understanding of the natural history of COVID-19 and the ability to prognosticate at an individual patient level. Finally, increased demand for critical care resources, the institution of crisis standards, and limitations on staffing and equipment are forcing the critical care community to confront the ethical boundaries between individual patient benefit, distributive justice, and resource allocation [6][7][8]. Rational decision-making must prevail in order to maximise both individual patient, and societal benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The marked declines in presentations of acute coronary and cerebrovascular syndromes are contributed to by impaired healthcare accessibility from over-stretched emergency services and fear of exposure to COVID-19 at medical facilities. 2 These trends similarly impact patients with chronic diseases, threatening to impair long-term control, and perpetuate late detection of complications or deterioration in clinical condition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%