2005
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.dbm.3240248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prioritising and deploying data quality improvement activity

Abstract: or negative in impact. For example, an organisation that operates in a business-to-business environment would benefit from understanding organisational structures and linkages between individual sites that it may have identified as customers or prospects. If data on corporate structures either does not exist at all within the selling organisation, or is of poor quality, then various usages of that data-such as key account management, or credit management-will either not happen at all or will be incomplete or i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bush and Hair (1985), as well as Stuart and Adam (2003), compare different ways to collect data. Henderson and Murray (2005) discuss practical steps to increase the availability of data, while Foss et al (2002) continue this work with discussion of how to increase the quality/completeness of data sets. Kara et al (1994), as well as Lix et al (1995), address the treatment of missing data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bush and Hair (1985), as well as Stuart and Adam (2003), compare different ways to collect data. Henderson and Murray (2005) discuss practical steps to increase the availability of data, while Foss et al (2002) continue this work with discussion of how to increase the quality/completeness of data sets. Kara et al (1994), as well as Lix et al (1995), address the treatment of missing data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, “accidental control” may help explain recent findings in academic and business reports of businesses facing difficulties in managing and harnessing data for purposes of effective and satisfactory service provision (Tapp and Hughes, 2004; Henderson and Murray, 2005). Data collected by companies are frequently inaccessible or are scattered across non-coordinated databases (Wong et al , 2005) and companies struggle to leverage and synthesise data (Spencer-Matthews and Lawley, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of strategies and methodologies from the data quality management literature (Even and Shankaranarayanan, 2007, p. 75; McGill et al , 2003; Satzinger and Olfman, 1998; Fang and Neufeld, 2006; Henderson and Murray, 2005) could be considered in an effort to improve FMIS data quality dimensions of completeness, validity, accuracy, currency, and context, as well as for data quality management approaches. This could involve the use of “wrapping” (the use of embedded code to make FMIS self‐verifying) and “the subsequent phased introduction of software to minimize failures” (Knaus et al , 2004).…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%