2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1103-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prioritization of cancer therapeutic targets using CRISPR–Cas9 screens

Abstract: Author contributions M.G., K.Y., and C.B-D. conceived the project. F.B. led CRISPR-Cas9 screening, codeveloped Project Score webportal, performed analyses, verified WRN dependency. F.I. led computational analyses and figure preparation, contributed to the Project Score webportal. G.P. performed experiments to verify WRN dependency, carried out analyses, contributed to in vivo studies. E.G. contributed to computational analysis and figures. D.vdM. contributed to developing the Project Score webportal. G.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

57
1,274
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,061 publications
(1,420 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
57
1,274
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the analysis of the mutational landscape of cancer has also uncovered the existence of mutual exclusivity and co-occurrence patterns among driver gene alterations [16,69]. Many computational tools have been developed to identify those combinatorial patterns experimentally (i.e via CRISPR-Cas9 screens [70,71]) or computationally [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79]. Patterns of mutual exclusivity can arise from functional redundancy, context-specific dependencies (i.e tumor type or sub-type specific driving alterations), or synthetic lethality interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the analysis of the mutational landscape of cancer has also uncovered the existence of mutual exclusivity and co-occurrence patterns among driver gene alterations [16,69]. Many computational tools have been developed to identify those combinatorial patterns experimentally (i.e via CRISPR-Cas9 screens [70,71]) or computationally [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79]. Patterns of mutual exclusivity can arise from functional redundancy, context-specific dependencies (i.e tumor type or sub-type specific driving alterations), or synthetic lethality interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patterns of mutual exclusivity can arise from functional redundancy, context-specific dependencies (i.e tumor type or sub-type specific driving alterations), or synthetic lethality interactions. While functional redundancy has been used to reveal unknown functional interactions [79], the synthetic lethality concept has been very successfully applied to the identification of novel therapeutic targets [70,71] or rational drug combinations [71], and to the prediction of drug response in cell lines [71] and patients [78].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PC has been used to analyze transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data in a large number of projects across diseases to further our understanding of human biology in health and disease (4,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) . Since our original report in 2011, significant advances have been made with regard to the breadth and volume of data available along with software tools to support data creation, validation, and accessibility in the wider research community.…”
Section: And the Proteomics Standards Initiative Molecularmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeted drug therapy has become a major cancer treatment beyond surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy 1 . Validating primary targets and developing targeted drugs has received increasing attention 2 . In concert, over the last 20 years, the kinase family has been recognized as important drug targets [3][4] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%