2013
DOI: 10.1108/jmtm-04-2011-0039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prioritization of innovation factors by the integration of concurrent function deployment and P diagram with a case study in Sepahan Industry Group

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this research is to propose a new model for the integration of concurrent function deployment (CFD) and parameter (P) diagram in order to prioritize innovation factors.Design/methodology/approachEach of the approaches of CFD and P diagram and their features has been demonstrated and according to their common features, an integrated model has been designed in two phases. It has been examined in Sepahan Industrial Group, of which the major product is API gas pipeline network demanded by Isf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Innovation can be classified, differently. Shahin and Bakhshi (2013) classified the innovation factors in to four categories of inputs, outputs, control and noise factors regarding the parameter diagram. In another classification, it can be in two forms of incremental and radical innovation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovation can be classified, differently. Shahin and Bakhshi (2013) classified the innovation factors in to four categories of inputs, outputs, control and noise factors regarding the parameter diagram. In another classification, it can be in two forms of incremental and radical innovation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the enablers, CSFs and barriers can be assumed as inputs, control factors and noise factors, respectively. Such classification of factors can help apply other problem‐solving tools and techniques such as quality function deployment or even, concurrent quality function deployment for prioritizing FI factors (similar to Shahin & Bakhshi, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationships between these factors are suggested to be examined using a system dynamics approach. Researchers are encouraged to perform an SLR on all of the related terms such as Jugaad, Shahin & Bakhshi, 2013).…”
Section: Research Limitations and Future Study Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of requirements in five categories – attractive, one-dimensional, must-be, indifferent and reverse – has often been a target for criticism (Lee et al , 2011). For the same reason, there have been several phases of improvements in the classification of requirements within the Kano model (Lee and Huang, 2009; Chen, 2012; Shahin and Bakhshi, 2013). One of the most recent modifications has been to classify requirements based on visualisation.…”
Section: A New Approach To the Capture And Evaluation Of Innovative Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of its first and most influential definitions was proposed by Schumpeter (1934), who linked it to the economic development and defined it as a new combination of productive sources (Hidalgo and Albors, 2008). Views of innovation changed over time and from “a unit of technological change”, it became an idea more focussed on creativity and its development: “creativity is the process of idea generation and innovation is the process of changing ideas into know-how and finally, a product” (Shahin and Bakhshi, 2013). For organisations, innovation means increased competitiveness, lower costs and a better understanding of customers’ needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%