Prioritization of public health financing, organization, and workforce transformation: a Delphi study in Canada

Abstract

Background The increased scrutiny on public health brought upon by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic provides a strong impetus for a renewal of public health systems. This paper seeks to understand priorities of public health decision-makers for reforms to public health financing, organization, interventions, and workforce. Methods We used an online 3-round real-time Delphi method of reaching consensus on priorities for public health systems reform. Participants were recruited among individuals holding senior roles in Canadian public health institutions, ministries of health and regional health authorities. In Round 1, participants were asked to rate 9 propositions related to public health financing, organization, workforce, and interventions. Participants were also asked to contribute up to three further ideas in relation to these topics in open-ended format. In Rounds 2 and 3, participants re-appraised their ratings in the view of the group’s ratings in the previous round. Results Eighty-six public health senior decision-makers from various public health organizations across Canada were invited to participate. Of these, 25/86 completed Round 1 (29% response rate), 19/25 completed Round 2 (76% retention rate) and 18/19 completed Round 3 (95% retention rate). Consensus (defined as more than 70% of importance rating) was achieved for 6 out of 9 propositions at the end of the third round. In only one case, the consensus was that the proposition was not important. Proposition rated consensually important relate to targeted public health budget, time frame for spending this budget, and the specialization of public health structures. Both interventions related and not related to the COVID-19 pandemic were judged important. Open-ended comments further highlighted priorities for renewal in public health governance and public health information management systems. Conclusion Consensus emerged rapidly among Canadian public health decision-makers on prioritizing public health budget and time frame for spending. Ensuring that public health services beyond COVID-19 and communicable disease are maintained and enhanced is also of central importance. Future research shall explore potential trade-offs between these priorities.

Equity in HIV/AIDS services requires optimization of mainstreaming sectors in Ethiopia

“…Reasonable budgeting, initiating, or strengthening local funds, economic empowerment, or support for the poor will be important solutions to handle financial problems. Prioritising public health budget and health financing also strengthen the workforce, availability of resources, and improved access to health services [ 74 , 75 ]. Furthermore, contracting with local or international NGOs will support the country’s progress in achieving UHC [ 76 , 77 ] that needs well-trained workforce to integrate NGO’s mission into the existing system.…”

Challenges to Global Health Emerging from the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Partial or limited solutions will not resolve global problems and cannot mitigate the impact these problems have for the greater part of the world. Notwithstanding that, it is important to learn from successful approaches at the national level in order to propose potentially successful strategies [130][131][132]. They underline a clear case for public health financing, organization, and workforce orientation.…”