Prioritizing COVID-19 tests based on participatory surveillance and spatial scanning

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to identify, describe and analyze priority areas for COVID-19 testing combining participatory surveillance and traditional surveillance. Design It was carried out a descriptive transversal study in the city of Caruaru, Pernambuco state, Brazil, within the period of 20/02/2020 to 05/05/2020. Data included all official reports for influenza-like illness notified by the municipality health department and the self-reports collected through the participatory surveillance platform Brasil Sem Corona. Methods We used linear regression and loess regression to verify a correlation between Participatory Surveillance (PS) and Traditional Surveillance (TS). Also a spatial scanning approach was deployed in order to identify risk clusters for COVID-19. Results In Caruaru, the PS had 861 active users, presenting an average of 1.2 reports per user per week. The platform Brasil Sem Corona started on March 20th and since then, has been officially used by the Caruaru health authority to improve the quality of information from the traditional surveillance system. Regarding the respiratory syndrome cases from TS, 1588 individuals were positive for this clinical outcome. The spatial scanning analysis detected 18 clusters and 6 of them presented statistical significance (p-value < 0.1). Clusters 3 and 4 presented an overlapping area that was chosen by the local authority to deploy the COVID-19 serology, where 50 individuals were tested. From there, 32 % (n = 16) presented reagent results for antibodies related to COVID-19. Conclusion Participatory surveillance is an effective epidemiological method to complement the traditional surveillance system in response to the COVID-19 pandemic by adding real-time spatial data to detect priority areas for COVID-19 testing.

The main factors influencing COVID-19 spread and deaths in Mexico: A comparison between Phases I and II

“…For instance, when there is a substantial overlap of secondary clusters, e.g., Figure 2(a), it is indicative of an urgent need of regional measures for the prevention, containment and coordination to be implemented in combating the COVID-19 health crisis. Successfully examples of localized policy interventions are detailed in Leal-Neto et al (2020) and Dlamini et al (2020) for the case of Brazil and Eswatini (Africa), respectively. Likewise, some of the spatial clusters identified in this work grouped together municipalities from different states.…”

Geospatial dynamics of COVID‐19 clusters and hotspots in Bangladesh

“…The highest number of clusters was detected during June, followed by July. There is a difference in the number of the detected cluster between the current study with the earlier study conducted by Masrur et al (2020) which is due to variating in the cluster estimation techniques because we did not include the time in the analysis as the cases report delay due to inadequate laboratory capacity at the country level and the latency of the COVID-19 cases (Leal-Neto et al, 2020;Thanh Toan et al, 2013). These clustering maps would provide baseline epidemiological information for the assessment of the differentiated risk related to acquiring COVID-19 in certain areas of Bangladesh.…”

The main factors influencing COVID-19 spread and deaths in Mexico: A comparison between phases I and II

“…For instance, substantial overlapping of secondary clusters ( Figure 1 (a)) indicates an urgent need for regional measures for prevention, containment, and coordination to be implemented in combating the COVID-19 health crisis. Successful examples of localized policy interventions are detailed by Leal-Neto et al (2020) and Dlamini et al (2020) for the case of Brazil and Eswatini (Africa), respectively.…”