2020
DOI: 10.1108/ijlma-10-2017-0244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prioritizing determinants of effective whistle blowing (WB)

Abstract: Purpose In current vista of corporate governance (CG), whistleblowing (WB) has become critical for practitioners, researchers and other stakeholders. This study aims to identify, prioritize and analyze the interrelationships of determinants of effective WB on the basis of opinion of a medium-sized panel of experts. Design/methodology/approach It is a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted in the field setting. A self-administered structured questionnaire was used to collect primary data from the respond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To collect data from experts face to face, a one-to-one interview is used (Abbass et al, 2021). The study uses ISM for modeling and MICMAC for data analysis that has the capability of using small set of qualitative data and providing relatively more insights (Wafield, 1973;Shaukat, et al, 2021b;Niazi, et al, 2020a;Niazi, et al, 2020b;Niazi, et al, 2020c;Niazi, Qazi, & Basit, 2020;Audi et al, 2021;Qazi, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To collect data from experts face to face, a one-to-one interview is used (Abbass et al, 2021). The study uses ISM for modeling and MICMAC for data analysis that has the capability of using small set of qualitative data and providing relatively more insights (Wafield, 1973;Shaukat, et al, 2021b;Niazi, et al, 2020a;Niazi, et al, 2020b;Niazi, et al, 2020c;Niazi, Qazi, & Basit, 2020;Audi et al, 2021;Qazi, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the ideal size for a heterogeneous panel is 8–12 experts and 15–25 experts for homogenous panels. This type of study’s scope is 10–20 experts [ 46 , 57 59 ]. In this study, the panel size is sixteen experts, i.e., considered to be the optimum size of the panel.…”
Section: Methodology/data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SSIM (Table 3 ) is converted into initial reachability matrix (Table 4 ) using the classical rules of translating VAXO symbols into binary codes (Warfield 1973 ; Niazi et al 2020 ; Attri et al 2013 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%