Prioritizing rehabilitation in low- and middle-income country national health systems: a qualitative thematic synthesis and development of a policy framework

Abstract

Background There is a large and growing unmet need for rehabilitation – a diverse category of services that aim to improve functioning across the life course – particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Yet despite urgent calls to increase political commitment, many low- and middle-income country governments have dedicated little attention to expanding rehabilitation services. Existing policy scholarship explains how and why health issues reach the policy agenda and offers applicable evidence to advance access to physical, medical, psychosocial, and other types of rehabilitation services. Drawing from this scholarship and empirical data on rehabilitation, this paper proposes a policy framework to understand national-level prioritization of rehabilitation in low- and middle-income countries. Methods We conducted key informant interviews with rehabilitation stakeholders in 47 countries, complemented by a purposeful review of peer-reviewed and gray literature to achieve thematic saturation. We analyzed the data abductively using a thematic synthesis methodology. Rehabilitation-specific findings were triangulated with policy theory and empirical case studies on the prioritization of other health issues to develop the framework. Results The novel policy framework includes three components which shape the prioritization of rehabilitation on low- and middle-income countries’ national government’s health agendas. First, rehabilitation lacks a consistent problem definition, undermining the development of consensus-driven solutions which could advance the issue on policy agendas. Second, governance arrangements are fragmented within and across government ministries, between the government and its citizens, and across national and transnational actors engaged in rehabilitation service provision. Third, national legacies – particularly from civil conflict – and weaknesses in the existing health system influences both rehabilitation needs and implementation feasibility. Conclusions This framework can support stakeholders in identifying the key components impeding prioritization for rehabilitation across different national contexts. This is a crucial step for ultimately better advancing the issue on national policy agendas and improving equity in access to rehabilitation services.

Orthopaedic and trauma research in Tanzania: A scoping review

“…In addition to raising awareness, future research should focus on rehabilitation and post-operative management of trauma patients, as this theme was seldom examined in the literature. By optimizing rehabilitation, patients will be better able to return to their livelihood, support their families, and contribute to the country’s economic growth, benefiting all shareholders [ 40 ].…”

Rehabilitation needs screening to identify potential beneficiaries: a scoping review

“…A reliable identification of beneficiaries is key for generating evidence-based and consensus-driven solutions. 25 It has been suggested to describe a rehabilitation need based on an individual's self-reported health. 26 A disagreement in rehabilitation potential, however, can be noted between people's self-perception, which is influenced by their own awareness about rehabilitation services and their benefits, and health worker or carer assessment.…”

Self-Rehabilitation Strategy for Rural Community-dwelling Stroke Survivors in a Lower-Middle Income Country: A Delphi Study

“…In some regions of LMICs, more than 50% of people do not receive the rehabilitation services they require. 5 Disturbances including conflicts, disasters and outbreak of infectious diseases create massive surges in rehabilitation needs while also disrupting any available rehabilitation services. The effect of the recent COVID-19 pandemic and its associated physical distancing protocols, and other emerging communicable diseases add up to already existing challenges to stroke rehabilitation delivery in many regions of LMICs.…”