Prioritizing Sponsorship Resources in Formula One Racing: A Longitudinal Analysis

Abstract

Accessing and exploiting organizational resources are essential capabilities for competitive sport organizations, particularly those engaged in motorsports, where teams lacking resources frequently dissolve. Corporate sponsorship represents a common method for resource acquisition, yet not all sponsorships equally benefit the sponsored organization. Sponsorship utility can be dependent on institutional dynamics such as league governance that produces competitive disparities. Through this study we extend the resource-based view to assert that sponsorships vary in their propensity to contribute to team survival, warranting prioritization in sponsorship strategy based on access to different sponsor resources. To empirically investigate the influence of a variety of sponsorships, survival analysis modeling was used to examine 40 years of corporate sponsorship of Formula One racing teams. One finding from the longitudinal analysis was that sponsorships offering financial or performance-based resources enhance team survival to a greater degree than operational sponsorships. However, such prioritization is subject to team experience, changes in institutional monetary allocation, and diminishing returns.

Strategy and Paradoxes of Borda Count in Formula 1 Racing

“…These subtle changes meant that Jordan dropped from 5 th down to 9 th for the championship (See Tables 5a and 5b), which likely cost the team millions of dollars in championship payouts (Budzinski and Müller-Kock 2018) and probably several times that amount in sponsorship dollars. Taking such a fi nancial hit would only exacerbate their problems, making them less competitive the following season, leading to a snowball effect (Cobbs et al 2017). Though the team were facing several other challenges at the time, the scoring changes for 2003 most certainly played a part in the team's demise.…”

Sponsees matter! How collective responsibility judgments of sport sponsors affect sponsee equity

“…Sponsee rights-holders have direct responsibility for a sponsee yet sponsors are also attributed some responsibility to sponsees' successes (Messner & Reinhard, 2012), both in terms of performance (e.g. Formula 1 team performance is partially predicated on the sponsors' car components and engineering, see Cobbs, Tyler, Jensen, & Chan (2017)), and in terms of financing viability and professional running of the event (e.g. .…”

New applications of survival analysis modeling: Examining intercollegiate athletic donor relationship dissolution

“…Researchers illuminated factors contributing to the survival or dissolution of sport organizations (Cobbs et al, 2017) and business to business marketing partnerships (Jensen & Turner, 2017). In an evaluation of business relationships with global sport megaevents, sponsorship agreements were less likely to survive and most susceptible to dissolution in the first two renewal periods (Jensen & Turner, 2017).…”