1991
DOI: 10.1109/49.108688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Priority queueing strategies and buffer allocation protocols for traffic control at an ATM integrated broadband switching system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 shows packet loss probabilities of drop-level 1 and drop level 2 packets, where 50% of all the packets are drop-level 1 packets and the rest are drop-level 2 packets. Similarly to the results presented in [13], we find that PBS reduces the packet loss probability of drop--level1 packets more than does non-priority packet forwarding. This reduction is achieved at the expense of the drop-level 2 packet loss probability.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 7 shows packet loss probabilities of drop-level 1 and drop level 2 packets, where 50% of all the packets are drop-level 1 packets and the rest are drop-level 2 packets. Similarly to the results presented in [13], we find that PBS reduces the packet loss probability of drop--level1 packets more than does non-priority packet forwarding. This reduction is achieved at the expense of the drop-level 2 packet loss probability.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…The buffer utilization in the PBS strategy is lower than that in other singlequeue-based strategies such as HOL (Head-of-the-Line priority queueing) [12] and PO (Push Out) [13]. Since HOL and PO allow using the whole buffer, the utilization of the optical buffer increases.…”
Section: Pbs: Partial Buffer Sharingmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are a number of different buffer management schemes studied in [19], [21], [31], [32], and [37]. These are namely complete sharing (CS) with no enforced capacity allocation mechanism, complete partitioning (CP) with equal partitioning of the available buffer capacity, and partial sharing (PS) with dedicated portions of the buffer space as well as a common shared portion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%