2021
DOI: 10.1007/s41062-021-00633-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Priority ranking of road pavements for maintenance using analytical hierarchy process and VIKOR method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the VIKOR method was found to be compatible with this study. This method has been widely accepted for decision making due to its effectiveness for the selection of optimum alternatives in complex systems, taking balance between various decision variables and possibilities to make the decision more reasonable and less subjective (Chundi et al, 2022;Kiani et al, 2018;Zhao et al, 2017). Alternatives are evaluated, compared and ranked based on the measure of closeness to the ideal solution according to an established criteria and relying on rules of acceptable advantage and stability of the optimal solution, which enables to select one or multiple compromise solutions (Jahan et al, 2011;Kiani et al, 2018;Ongpeng et al, 2022;Zheng et al, 2019).…”
Section: Multicriteria Decision Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, the VIKOR method was found to be compatible with this study. This method has been widely accepted for decision making due to its effectiveness for the selection of optimum alternatives in complex systems, taking balance between various decision variables and possibilities to make the decision more reasonable and less subjective (Chundi et al, 2022;Kiani et al, 2018;Zhao et al, 2017). Alternatives are evaluated, compared and ranked based on the measure of closeness to the ideal solution according to an established criteria and relying on rules of acceptable advantage and stability of the optimal solution, which enables to select one or multiple compromise solutions (Jahan et al, 2011;Kiani et al, 2018;Ongpeng et al, 2022;Zheng et al, 2019).…”
Section: Multicriteria Decision Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatives are evaluated, compared and ranked based on the measure of closeness to the ideal solution according to an established criteria and relying on rules of acceptable advantage and stability of the optimal solution, which enables to select one or multiple compromise solutions (Jahan et al, 2011;Kiani et al, 2018;Ongpeng et al, 2022;Zheng et al, 2019). During this process, decision makers are allowed to participate in the definition of preference data and weights (Chundi et al, 2022;Mela et al, 2012). This method has been commonly used for applications in construction (Sánchez-Garrido et al, 2021a;Wang et al, 2018), including material selection (Kiani et al, 2018), building design and construction methods (Mela et al, 2012;Sánchez-Garrido et al, 2021a, 2021b, recycling of construction products , maintenance processes (Chundi et al, 2022;Zheng et al, 2019) and energy efficiency in buildings (Ongpeng et al, 2022).…”
Section: Multicriteria Decision Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, various road damages can lead to traffic accidents. Naturally, sustainable development will undoubtedly be limited in the long term due to budget constraints and priority shifts [3]. This condition can encourage road infrastructure service providers in each country to seek the latest problem-solving approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ranking of alternatives is one of the most crucial steps of MAGDM. At present, there are many alternative ranking methods, such as TOPSIS [34,35], VIKOR [36], PROMETHEE [37], MULTIMOORA [38], and ELECTRE III [39], etc. Wojciech Sałabun et al [40] performed simulation experiments on the TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II methods to calculate the similarity of their obtained final rankings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%