Priority setting in research: user led mental health research

Abstract

Plain English summary Involving people in health research is increasingly recognised as being important to make sure that research is focused more on the needs of people who use health services. At present, ideas about what should be researched most often comes from researchers and/or health professionals like doctors and nurses rather than people with a lived experience of mental illness. In this study, we will talk with this group of people from across Wales to explore what they think research into their health services should focus on. The findings from this work will help to influence the work of the National Centre for Mental Health Research Partnership Group; as well as` researchers and health professionals and others who concentrate on mental health research. The Research group is a partnership between people with a lived experience of mental ill health and professionals with an interest in mental ill health. The group plan to take forward the ideas that came from this research and some of the ideas have already been used to increase funding in the area of mental health research. Abstract Background This paper is the result of continued collaboration between members of the Service User and Carer Research Partnership, based in Wales and supported by the National Centre for Mental Health, Health and Care Research Wales, and Hafal. The aim of this study was to explore the research priorities of people with experience of mental health services which include people with a lived experience of mental ill health, their carers, and professionals. Method A nominal group technique was used to gather data. A one-day workshop ‘Getting Involved in Research: Priority Setting’ was held to gather the ideas and suggestions for research priorities from people who have experience of mental health services. Results Twenty-five participants attended the workshop. 5 were mental health professionals, 20 had a lived experience of mental ill health, (of which 3 were also carers). 11 were male and 14 were female. 120 research ideas were generated across 6 ‘Ideas Generating Workstations’. Participants took part in a 3 stage vote to narrow down the ideas to 2 main research priorities. Conclusion The two main research priority areas that were identified: ‘Developing the knowledge of mental health issues amongst school-aged children’ as a vehicle to overcome stigma and discrimination, and to support young people to manage their own mental health. ‘Developing education as a tool for recovery’, for example by peer support. In addition, participants engaged in a notable discussion over the research priority: ‘How are carers supported during the recovery of the person for whom they care?’

“I don't think we've quite got there yet”: The experience of allyship for mental health consumer researchers

“…Participant responses suggested that allies have to work within practical constraints, seizing opportunities by corralling resources when they can, while at the same time advocating for the positions at multiple levels and across a range of settings. The stigma associated with mental illness further impacts on the perceived credibility of consumer researchers (Ghisoni et al., ; Hipes, Lucas, Phelan, & White, ; Segal & Hayes, ). Allies, on the other hand, are seen as credible due to their positions, professional background and research track record (Happell & Scholz, ; Hutchison, ).…”

Prioritizing barriers and solutions to improve employment for persons with developmental disabilities

“…Each table has a facilitator (trained by the lead facilitator prior to the event) as well as a note taker. The roles of the lead and table facilitators were critical, especially in providing clear explanations of the group goal, promoting purposeful interactions between group members and helping participants to feel at ease [56]. All participants signed an informed consent form prior to participating in the event and the project was reviewed and approved by the local university research ethics board.…”

Outcomes identified and prioritised by consumers of Partners in Recovery: a consumer-led study

“…Consumer leadership of the research process has been purported and demonstrated to strengthen both the quality and translation of research and achieves the goal of inclusive research practice "nothing about us without us" [14,15]. Due to unique knowledge developed through lived experience of mental illness and recovery, consumer researchers focus on different areas and ask different research questions [16].…”