2017
DOI: 10.15446/rsap.v19n2.55175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Priorización para el análisis de información en salud pública, preferencias de la red de conocimiento del Observatorio Nacional de Salud

Abstract: Participants perceive both chronic and infectious diseases as a priority, which is consistent with the epidemiological transition of the country. The priority for the Colombian health system is to strengthen the capacity of human resources and the surveillance system in different areas to have a better decision-making process in relation to public health.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effective decision-making in public policy necessitates transparent, reliable governance that can adeptly respond to changing circumstances while ensuring equity across the population. (13) In the context of Low-and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) like Colombia, substantial documented de ciencies in decision-making processes have led to the characterization of those processes as arbitrary, occasionally contradictory, and often unrealistic. Decision-making in these instances is often in uenced by short-term needs or anecdotal evidence and frequently aligns with personal interests, ultimately undermining the overall quality and impact of implemented programs and policies (12,13) (14) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Effective decision-making in public policy necessitates transparent, reliable governance that can adeptly respond to changing circumstances while ensuring equity across the population. (13) In the context of Low-and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) like Colombia, substantial documented de ciencies in decision-making processes have led to the characterization of those processes as arbitrary, occasionally contradictory, and often unrealistic. Decision-making in these instances is often in uenced by short-term needs or anecdotal evidence and frequently aligns with personal interests, ultimately undermining the overall quality and impact of implemented programs and policies (12,13) (14) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(13) In the context of Low-and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) like Colombia, substantial documented de ciencies in decision-making processes have led to the characterization of those processes as arbitrary, occasionally contradictory, and often unrealistic. Decision-making in these instances is often in uenced by short-term needs or anecdotal evidence and frequently aligns with personal interests, ultimately undermining the overall quality and impact of implemented programs and policies (12,13) (14) . This subjective decisionmaking approach not only carries the potential for negative impacts on population health outcomes, resulting in unintended harms, but also leads to the unnecessary waste of resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%