2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.05408
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Priors on Lagrangian bias parameters from galaxy formation modelling

Matteo Zennaro,
Raul E. Angulo,
Sergio Contreras
et al.

Abstract: We study the relations among the parameters of the hybrid Lagrangian bias expansion model, fitting biased auto and cross power spectra up to 𝑘 max = 0.7ℎ Mpc −1 . We consider ∼ 8000 halo and galaxy samples, with different halo masses, redshifts, galaxy number densities, and varying the parameters of the galaxy formation model. Galaxy samples are obtained through state-of-the-art extended subhalo abundance matching techniques and include both stellar-mass and star-formation-rate selected galaxies. All of these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in which s 2 (q) = s ij s ij , and s ij is the traceless part of the tidal tensor. This has the advantage of being agnostic to the galaxy formation processes, and also very flexible, allowing one to fit virtually any galaxy population merely by changing the values of the bias parameters [22]. Using equation (3.1) one can obtain an approximation for the galaxy density field in Lagrangian space; however, to compare it to observations one must have it in Eulerian space.…”
Section: Bias Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in which s 2 (q) = s ij s ij , and s ij is the traceless part of the tidal tensor. This has the advantage of being agnostic to the galaxy formation processes, and also very flexible, allowing one to fit virtually any galaxy population merely by changing the values of the bias parameters [22]. Using equation (3.1) one can obtain an approximation for the galaxy density field in Lagrangian space; however, to compare it to observations one must have it in Eulerian space.…”
Section: Bias Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[96], generalized to mock galaxies in refs. [97,98]. For the shotnoise term we choose a Gaussian prior on SN, centered on the Poisson value (Table 1) with a width of 30% [99].…”
Section: Parameter Priors Sampling and Emulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar work, for galaxies in IllustrisTNG (Nelson et al 2021), has been explored recently (Barreira et al 2021). As this work was being finalized, Zennaro et al (2021b) used hybrid EFT models precisely in this way to study the distributions of second-order Lagrangian bias for samples of galaxies populated using an extended sub-halo abundance matching scheme. at kmax ∼ 0.4 hMpc −1 is not inconsistent with the results of the work of Kokron et al (2021) which fit power spectra to kmax = 0.6 hMpc −1 (and recently Zennaro et al (2021b) which go to even smaller scales).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As this work was being finalized, Zennaro et al (2021b) used hybrid EFT models precisely in this way to study the distributions of second-order Lagrangian bias for samples of galaxies populated using an extended sub-halo abundance matching scheme. at kmax ∼ 0.4 hMpc −1 is not inconsistent with the results of the work of Kokron et al (2021) which fit power spectra to kmax = 0.6 hMpc −1 (and recently Zennaro et al (2021b) which go to even smaller scales). Those publications were concerned with fitting the clustering and lensing power spectra, while in this publication we concern ourselves with the significantly more difficult problem of describing the full statistical properties of the field that encapsulates information from all N -point functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%