2020
DOI: 10.31222/osf.io/gwdhk
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews

Abstract: The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed to facilitate transparent and complete reporting of systematic reviews and has been updated (to PRISMA 2020) to reflect recent advances in systematic review methodology and terminology. Here, we present the explanation and elaboration pap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
621
3
43

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 570 publications
(669 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
621
3
43
Order By: Relevance
“…This systematic review followed the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines [59].…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This systematic review followed the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines [59].…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference lists and the future citation of the retrieved articles will be manually searched with two additional rounds. As currently no well-established guidelines exist on conducting methodological reviews, we will follow the general recommendations in the literature [ 13 ], the guidelines under development [ 14 ], and the PRISMA-P statement for the methodological review [ 15 , 16 ]. Review of review articles will serve for identifying the literature covered within the reviews.…”
Section: Methods/study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 ; [ 37 ]). Diese neueste Version ist unter dem Titel „PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration“ als Preprint verfügbar [ 38 ]. Exemplarisch nennen wir hier die 12 wichtigsten Punkte für die Bewertung eines Abstracts (Tab.…”
Section: Bewertungstools: „Risk Of Bias“ Und Prismaunclassified