2001
DOI: 10.1177/0032885501081003004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prisoner Reentry: Public Safety and Reintegration Challenges

Abstract: Changes in sentencing practices, coupled with a decrease in prison rehabilitation programs, have placed new demands on the U.S. parole system. Nearly 700,000 parolees are "doing time" on the streets. Most have been released to a parole system that provides few services and imposes conditions that almost guarantee failure. This article examines the state of parole in today's corrections environment-from indeterminate and determinate sentencing policies to investing in prisoner reentry programs. Specifically, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
134
1
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
134
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…They proposed: the development of seamless systems between prison and the community, particularly in terms of health and employment; intensive preparation for release fostering independence; and the allocation of responsibility for reintegration from corrections agencies to community-based organisations to broker the relationship between prison and community. The combination of this work (Petersilia, 2001;Travis & Petersilia, 2001) and subsequent book (Petersilia, 2003) effectively laid out the research agenda for prison-to-community transition over the next decade; however, it would appear that most of the challenges remain unresolved and the same themes occur continuously throughout the literature.…”
Section: Understanding the Transition Experience Of The General Prisomentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They proposed: the development of seamless systems between prison and the community, particularly in terms of health and employment; intensive preparation for release fostering independence; and the allocation of responsibility for reintegration from corrections agencies to community-based organisations to broker the relationship between prison and community. The combination of this work (Petersilia, 2001;Travis & Petersilia, 2001) and subsequent book (Petersilia, 2003) effectively laid out the research agenda for prison-to-community transition over the next decade; however, it would appear that most of the challenges remain unresolved and the same themes occur continuously throughout the literature.…”
Section: Understanding the Transition Experience Of The General Prisomentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In a critical essay, Petersilia (2001) flagged many of the key issues that still remain current for people leaving prison, including the unmet needs of parolees, a tendency for parole supervision to replace support services, the high risk of homelessness post-release, the destabilising impact on communities and neighbourhoods from large numbers of returning prisoners, the important role of employment and difficulty in finding work due to stigma and economic changes, the impact of incarceration on families, and parole revocation practices that "almost guarantee parolees failure" (2001, p. 372). Travis and Petersilia (2001) built on this work by calling for a reform agenda to abolish parole and replace it with specifically targeted transition support.…”
Section: Understanding the Transition Experience Of The General Prisomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determinate sentencing means automatic release (Petersilia, 2001). Today, indeterminate sentencing and discretionary release have been replaced with determinate sentencing in states, although Walker (2001) proposed that changing or abolishing parole would not reduce serious crime.…”
Section: Who Is In Prison?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the abolishment of parole or the reduction of parole authorities' discretion, the controlled system of earned release for selected inmates is replaced with automatic release for nearly all inmates (Petersilia, 2001). Instead of an adversarial system focused on punishment, it should rather be one of restorative justice that "emphasizes dialogue, negotiation, and the reestablishment of a positive relationship between victim and offender" (Walker, 1998, p. 224).…”
Section: Who Is In Prison?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These needs may be considerable for the individual parolee and may include, but are not limited to, family relationships, housing, employment, education, substance abuse and mental health treatment, and life skills training. Unfortunately, there is strong evidence to suggest that many inmates leave prison unprepared to meet the challenges of life in the community (Petersilia, 2001;Austin, 2001). Within the past decade federal funds have been appropriated to operate drug and reentry courts and other reentry programs for the express purpose of helping prisoners reintegrate into society.…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%