Privacy and Biometrics for Authentication Purposes: A Discussion of Untraceable Biometrics and Biometric Encryption

Cavoukian, Ann; Max, Snijder; Stoianov, Alex; Chibba, Michelle

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12595-9_3

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When a person resubmits their biometric information, the unique PIN or key is regenerated and compared to the stored string. In essence, biometric data can be seen as a decoder for a unique PIN that allows a person to be identified (Cavoukian & Snijder, 2009). Untraceable biometrics are recognised as one of the solutions to the risks mentioned above.…”

Section: Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The use of biometric technologies in ensuring critical infrastructure security: the context of protecting personal data

Samašonok¹,

Kamienas²,

Juškevičienė³

2023

JESI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article examines aspects of the use of biometric technologies and the protection of personal data as it relates to the protection of critical infrastructure in the state. The use of biometric technologies for the protection of critical infrastructure is e xamined in this article through employee identification to establish the identity of employees unequivocally, for example, when entering such infrastructure facilities. The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) sets specific conditions for processing biometric data. Still, the relevant data controllers often have problems finding the appropriate basis for processing, especially in the context of GDPR Article 9. The authors, having examined the conditions for the processing of biometric data, propose introducing a particular legal framework for the processing of biometric data as far as it relates to the protection of critical infrastructure.

show abstract

Section: Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The use of biometric technologies in ensuring critical infrastructure security: the context of protecting personal data

Samašonok¹,

Kamienas²,

Juškevičienė³

2023

JESI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Woodward (1997) presented privacy as a friend or foe to biometrics. Cavoukian (1999) and the Irish Council for Bioethics (2008) addressed the balance between privacy and biometrics. A comparative focus of China and the United States allows an exploration of privacy in two different political cultures as they shift to shared electronic health record systems and other HITs as part of improving the quality and delivery of health care.…”

Section: Privacy As Friend or Foe In Biometrics: Does Political Cultumentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Single and layered or multimodal (using more than one trait) applications of biometrics may yield major benefits of privacy protection and health data stewardship, patient–provider trust in handling of data, barriers against the cyber‐security threats of health data, and protection against medical identification theft and fraud. To be sure, the assets of biometric technology are numerous, but questions remain concerning biometrics as a friend or foe of privacy (Cavoukian, 1999; Irish Council for Bioethics, 2008; Woodward, 1997), especially in the rapid‐paced, shared environment of electronic health record systems (Jin, Ahn, Hu, Covington, & Zhang, 2010; Zuniga et al., 2010), divergent cultural settings of privacy policies and laws (Liu, 2008), and variations in the technical and legal perception and acceptance of biometrics perception (Elgarah & Falaleeva, 2005; Riley, Buckner, Johnson, & Benyon, 2009; Schimke et al., 2004).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health‐Care Data Protection and Biometric Authentication Policies: Comparative Culture and Technology Acceptance in China and in the United States

Brown¹

2012

Review of Policy Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A proliferation of health information technology (HIT) policies to implement dimensions of e‐health, including electronic medical records, electronic health records, personal health records, and e‐prescribing—along with expanding initiatives on mobile health in developed countries and emerging technologies—has sparked academic inquiry into the protection of privacy and data and the technology to protect privacy and data. This article examines HIT policies in the United States and in China and the use of authentication technologies to assess biometrics as privacy's friend or foe in different political frameworks with varying conceptions of privacy. An analysis of privacy in the context of health data protection, challenging relations of trust between patients and providers, the increasing perspective of health data integrity as a cyber‐security issue, and the growing rate of medical fraud and medical identity theft may yield findings of a convergence of views of privacy and biometrics unexpected of contrasting political cultures.

show abstract

Privacy and Biometrics for Authentication Purposes: A Discussion of Untraceable Biometrics and Biometric Encryption

Cited by 2 publications

References 6 publications

The use of biometric technologies in ensuring critical infrastructure security: the context of protecting personal data

The use of biometric technologies in ensuring critical infrastructure security: the context of protecting personal data

Health‐Care Data Protection and Biometric Authentication Policies: Comparative Culture and Technology Acceptance in China and in the United States

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About