The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication 2017
DOI: 10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Privacy and Secrecy

Abstract: Privacy has been defined as a state of being free from the observation or disturbance of other people. Secrecy has been defined as the intentional concealment of information from others. Whether official/unofficial in form, or major/trivial in their expression and consequence, privacy and secrecy are coexisting and symbiotic enactments of the impulse to control the knowledge or behaviors of other people; both terms gain meaning in relation to permitting or restricting other people's awareness or observations. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CPM has been used as a framework to understand various workplace phenomena including privacy rule decision criteria used by coworkers to selfdisclose, the implicit and explicit establishment of rules to coordinate privacy boundaries, strategies to manage privacy turbulence (Smith & Brunner, 2017), peer coworker communication, and workers' health, productivity, and organizational functioning (Ploeger-Lyons & Kelley, 2017). Additionally, researchers have examined the ways organizations, employees, and coworkers describe electronic monitoring and the privacy expectations, boundaries, and turbulence that arise from this surveillance (Allen et al, 2007); Facebook friend requests among coworkers (Frampton & Child, 2013); individual and group identity construction as a result of an organizations' withholding or obscuring information (Bean, 2017); and employees' attempts to manage health information at work (Westerman et al, 2017). Combined, these studies suggest that privacy rule decision criteria used by work spouses may be simultaneously influenced by their own preferences as well as organizational policies and practices.…”
Section: Communication Privacy Management Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPM has been used as a framework to understand various workplace phenomena including privacy rule decision criteria used by coworkers to selfdisclose, the implicit and explicit establishment of rules to coordinate privacy boundaries, strategies to manage privacy turbulence (Smith & Brunner, 2017), peer coworker communication, and workers' health, productivity, and organizational functioning (Ploeger-Lyons & Kelley, 2017). Additionally, researchers have examined the ways organizations, employees, and coworkers describe electronic monitoring and the privacy expectations, boundaries, and turbulence that arise from this surveillance (Allen et al, 2007); Facebook friend requests among coworkers (Frampton & Child, 2013); individual and group identity construction as a result of an organizations' withholding or obscuring information (Bean, 2017); and employees' attempts to manage health information at work (Westerman et al, 2017). Combined, these studies suggest that privacy rule decision criteria used by work spouses may be simultaneously influenced by their own preferences as well as organizational policies and practices.…”
Section: Communication Privacy Management Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secrecy is a paramount dimension of organizational life, viewed by Max Weber (Gerth & Mills, 1948), Georg Simmel (1906) and Robert Merton (1968) as an inherent characteristic of complex organizations (see Bean, 2017 and Costas & Grey, 2014 for recent overviews). The significance of secrecy is especially evident in the political arena in organizations because members use a variety of secrecy practices such as forming coalitions behind-the-scenes (Eisenhardt & Bourgeois, 1988), distorting and restricting information flow (Feldman, 1988) and withholding scarce knowledge (Jackall, 1988) to gain power and influence, as well as to contest institutional power and authority (Morrill, Zald, & Rao, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%