Privacy-Preserving Multi-party Aggregate Signcryption for Heterogeneous Systems

Niu, Shufen; Li, Zhenbin; Wang, Caifen

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68542-7_18

Cited by 19 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We do not consider other less time-consuming operations, such as the XOR operation. For the fairness of comparison, we extend schemes in [23,25,26] to n senders sending n messages to a receiver in Tables 2 and 3. Since other schemes in [23,26] only provide one-way heterogeneous communication, the comparisons are divided into PKI→IBC in Table 2 and IBC→PKI in Table 3 just for more scientific and elaborate results.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…From Tables 2 and 3, we can see our MOHSC-I and MOHSC-II schemes require a smaller total computation time (the sum of PKI setup, IBC setup, signcryption, and unsigncryption) when n messages are involved. The more intuitive analyses are given in Figures 3 and 4 for schemes in [23,25,26] and our schemes. We implement the experiment on MICA2 platform (same as [24]).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To ensure the secure V2I communication between these extreme heterogeneous devices, cryptographic schemes should be constructed to provide authentication, confidentiality, integrity, and non-repudiation, so signcryption naturally becomes the first choice. So far, a few signcryption schemes for heterogeneous environments have been proposed [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Many of these schemes consider two mainstream public key cryptosystems PKI and IBC.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, both schemes cannot protect the privacy of the senders. The scheme put forward in [26] gives a provable aggregate signcryption for heterogeneous PKI and IBC systems to improve the efficiency of computation and transmission. Unfortunately, it simply permits a user in a PKI system to transmit one message to the recipient in an IBC.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Upon receiving messages from many vehicles, the RSU first verifies the authenticity of these messages and then discards the error or distorted messages. Although some methods in [21][22][23][24][25][26] achieve heterogeneous communication, they have different disadvantages, which are given in Related Work. The function comparisons of all the schemes are depicted in Table 1.…”

Section: Performance Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Practical V2I Secure Communication Schemes for Heterogeneous VANETs

Zhou

Ding

2019

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the roadside infrastructure and vehicles come from different manufacturers, vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) now are extremely heterogeneous. It is difficult to communicate securely for heterogeneous facilities in VANETs because secure communication needs to concurrently realize confidentiality, authentication, integrity, and non-repudiation. To meet the above security attributes in one logical step, four bi-directional signcryption schemes are proposed for specific heterogeneous vehicle to infrastructure (V2I) communication in this paper. The first scheme supports batch verification, which allows multiple vehicles registered in a public key infrastructure (PKI) system to transmit messages to a receiver in an identity-based cryptosystem (IBC), both which are the mainstream public key cryptosystems. The second scheme supports a sender in a PKI to securely broadcast a message to multiple vehicles in an IBC. The communication direction of the latter two schemes is opposite to the former two schemes (i.e., from IBC to PKI). All these schemes can be proved to satisfy confidentiality and unforgeability based on the assumptions of decisional and computational Diffie-Hellman problems in the random oracle model. Furthermore, numerical analyses and simulation results demonstrate the computation costs, communication costs, storage, and the aggregate ciphertext length of our schemes are better than the existing ones.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Performance Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Practical V2I Secure Communication Schemes for Heterogeneous VANETs

Zhou

Ding

2019

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A secure and efficient heterogeneous ID‐based signcryption for unmanned aerial vehicular networking system

Aithekar,

Gupta,

Chaudhary

2024

Security and Privacy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last decade, Internet of Things opened the door to applications of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Since the data is transferred on a public channel, therefore security, privacy, and efficiency are the main concerns of UAVs communication. Signcryption is a technique to execute encryption and signature in one step. However, the usual signcryption is not applicable to UAVs with constrained nature of resources and ground station. Moreover, in particular, UAVs and ground station need a heterogeneous signcryption for UAVs to establish communication with the ground station. But, the bilinear bilinear mapping is a very costly operation, so we need pairless identity based heterogeneous signcryption. The proposed design is unforgeable and secure against chosen message attacks. The experiment shows the efficiency of the proposed method. It takes less communication and computation costs.

show abstract